Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1999; v. 89; no. 3; p. 785-795
© 1999 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharyya, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Recent earthquake sequences at Coso: Evidence for conjugate faulting and stress loading near a geothermal field

Joydeep Bhattacharyya, Susanna Gross, Jonathan Lees and Mike Hastings

Department of Geology and Geophysics Yale University, 210 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut 06511joydeep{at}hess.geology.yale.edu
CIRES University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
Naval Geothermal Program NAWS, Chinalake, California

Abstract

Two recent earthquake sequences near the Coso geothermal field show clear evidence of faulting along conjugate planes. We present results from analyzing an earthquake sequence occurring in 1998 and compare it with a similar sequence that occurred in 1996. The two sequences followed mainshocks that occurred on 27 November 1996 and 6 March 1998. Both mainshocks ruptured approximately colocated regions of the same fault system. Following a comparison with the background seismicity of the Coso region, we have detected evidence of stress loading within the geothermal field that appears to be in response to the 1998 earthquakes. The ML = 5.2 mainshock in the 1998 sequence occurred at 5:47 a.m. UTC and was located approximately 45 km north of the town of Ridgecrest in the Coso range. The mainshock of the 1996 sequence had an ML magnitude of 5.3. There have been no observable surface ruptures associated with either of these sequences. Though the mainshocks for both sequences were located about 900 m apart and have nearly the same local magnitudes, the sequences differ in both their temporal and spatial characteristics. An analysis of the fault-plane solutions of the mainshocks and the aftershock locations suggests that the two sequences ruptured fault planes that are perpendicular to one another. We observe a much faster temporal decay of the 1998 sequence compared to the one in 1996; moreover, while the 1996 sequence was not followed by any sizeable (i.e., ML > 4.0) aftershocks, the 1998 sequence had four such events. From an estimate of the tectonic stressing rate on the fault that produced the 1998 sequence, we infer a repeat cycle of 135 years for an earthquake of comparable magnitude at Coso.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
F.C. Monastero, A.M. Katzenstein, J.S. Miller, J.R. Unruh, M.C. Adams, and K. Richards-Dinger
The Coso geothermal field: A nascent metamorphic core complex
Geological Society of America Bulletin, November 1, 2005; 117(11-12): 1534 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Seismological Society of America.