Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1999; v. 89; no. 3; p. 750-763
© 1999 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vidal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Munguía, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The ML scale in northern Baja California, México

Antonio Vidal and Luis Munguía

Department of Seismology Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, B. C., Km 107 Carretera Tijuana - Ensenada, Ensenada, Baja California 22860, Méxicovidalv{at}cicese.mx; Imunguia{at}cicese.mx

Abstract

We found that the attenuation functions proposed for southern California by Richter (1958) and Hutton and Boore (1987) are not entirely suitable for local magnitude calculation for earthquakes in northern Baja California. In this study, we used zero-to-peak amplitudes from synthetic Wood-Anderson seismograms to determine appropriate – log A0 attenuation functions and station magnitude corrections through a multiple linear regression analysis. Our data were grouped so that each energy path was entirely contained in either the granitic Peninsular Ranges of Baja California (PRBC) or the sedimentary environment of the Mexicali-Imperial Valley (MIV). The best solutions of the regression analysis are -log A0 = (1.0134 ± 0.0288) log (r/100) + (0.0025 ± 0.0005) (r – 100) + 3.0 for MIV and –log A0 = (1.1319 ± 0.0197) log (r/100) + (0.0017 ± 0.0002) (r – 100) + 3.0 for PRBC, where r is hypocentral distance. A comparison of these functions with those for southern California revealed the following: (a) a remarkable agreement between Richter's function and the function for MIV at distances between 40 and 450 km, (b) Hutton and Boore's function and the function for PRBC are quite similar in the whole distance range considered (10 to 450 km), and (c) for both areas, at distances shorter than 50 km, the –log A0 Richter function was as much as 0.5 units lower than the others. Thus, as for other regions, the use of Richter's function results in understimation of local magnitudes at near-source distances. Additionally, the attenuation function for PRBC was 0.30 units lower than Richter's at 400 km, which means that at such longer distances the Richter function overestimates the magnitude of PRBC earthquakes. Finally, station magnitude corrections from –0.42 to 0.26 units were obtained, suggesting significant effects due to station site properties.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. Gonzalez, A. Vidal, and L. Munguia
An ML Scale for the La Paz-Los Cabos Region, Baja California Sur, Mexico
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2006; 96(4A): 1296 - 1304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A Detailed Microseismicity Study and Current Stress Regime in the Peninsular Ranges of Northern Baja California, Mexico: The Ojos Negros Region
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2000; 90(5): 1133 - 1142.



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Seismological Society of America.