HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Field, E. H. Articles by Dolan, J. F. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A mutually consistent seismic-hazard source model for southern California

University of Southern California Department of Earth Sciences, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740
University of California, Los Angeles Department of Earth and Space Sciences, 405 Hilgard Ave, Los Angeles, California 90024-1567

Abstract

A previous attempt to integrate geological, geodetic, and observed seismicity data into a probabilistic-hazard source model predicted a rate of magnitude 6 to 7 earthquakes significantly greater than that observed historically. One explanation was that the discrepancy, or apparent earthquake deficit, is an artifact of the upper magnitude limit built into the model. This was controversial, however, because removing the discrepancy required earthquakes larger than are seen in the geological record and larger than implied from empirical relationships between fault dimension and magnitude. Although several articles have addressed this issue, an alternative, integrated source model without an apparent deficit has not yet appeared. We present a simple geologically based approach for constructing such a model that agrees well with the historical record and does not invoke any unsubstantiated phenomena. The following factors are found to be influential: the b-value and minimum magnitude applied to Gutenberg-Richter seismicity; the percentage of moment released in characteristic earthquakes; a round-off error in the moment-magnitude definition; bias due to historical catalog incompleteness; careful adherence to the conservation of seismic moment rate; uncertainty in magnitude estimates obtained from empirical regressions; allowing multi-segment ruptures (cascades); and the time dependence of recurrence rates. The previous apparent deficit is shown to have resulted from a combination of these factors. None alone caused the problem nor solves it. The model presented here is relatively robust with respect to these factors.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. T. G. Raghukanth Estimation of Seismicity Parameters for India Seismological Research Letters, March 1, 2010; 81(2): 207 - 217. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. H. Field, T. E. Dawson, K. R. Felzer, A. D. Frankel, V. Gupta, T. H. Jordan, T. Parsons, M. D. Petersen, R. S. Stein, R. J. Weldon II, et al. Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2) Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2009; 99(4): 2053 - 2107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. H. Field A Summary of Previous Working Groups on California Earthquake Probabilities Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1033 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Pace, L. Peruzza, G. Lavecchia, and P. Boncio Layered Seismogenic Source Model and Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses in Central Italy Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2006; 96(1): 107 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Y. Kagan, D. D. Jackson, and Y. Rong A New Catalog of Southern California Earthquakes, 1800-2005 Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2006; 77(1): 30 - 38. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Short-Term Properties of Earthquake Catalogs and Models of Earthquake Source Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2004; 94(4): 1207 - 1228.

				The Seismogenic Thickness of the Southern California Crust Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 940 - 960.

				The Upper-Truncated Power Law Applied to Earthquake Cumulative Frequency-Magnitude Distributions: Evidence for a Time-Independent Scaling Parameter Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 2983 - 2993.

				S. Mazzotti and R. D. Hyndman Yakutat collision and strain transfer across the northern Canadian Cordillera Geology, June 1, 2002; 30(6): 495 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. H. Field and the SCEC Phase III Working Group Accounting for Site Effects in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California: Overview of the SCEC Phase III Report Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S1 - S31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Probability of Rupture of Multiple Fault Segments Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6): 1498 - 1506.

				E. H. Field and M. D. Petersen A Test of Various Site-Effect Parameterizations in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S222 - S244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Discrepancy between Earthquake Rates Implied by Historic Earthquakes and a Consensus Geologic Source Model for California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2000; 90(5): 1117 - 1132.