HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bazzurro, P. Articles by Allin Cornell, C. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Disaggregation of seismic hazard

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4020

Abstract

Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) integrates over all potential earthquake occurrences and ground motions to estimate the mean frequency of exceedance of any given spectral acceleration at the site. For improved communication and insights, it is becoming common practice to display the relative contributions to that hazard from the range of values of magnitude, M, distance, R, and epsilon, , the number of standard deviations from the median ground motion as predicted by an attenuation equation.

The proposed disaggregation procedures, while conceptually similar, differ in several important points that are often not reported by the researchers and not appreciated by the users. We discuss here such issues, for example, definition of the probability distribution to be disaggregated, different disaggregation techniques, disaggregation of R versus ln R, and the effects of different binning strategies on the results. Misconception of these details may lead to unintended interpretations of the relative contributions to hazard.

Finally, we propose to improve the disaggregation process by displaying hazard contributions in terms of not R, but latitude, longitude, as well as M and . This permits a display directly on a typical map of the faults of the surrounding area and hence enables one to identify hazard-dominating scenario events and to associate them with one or more specific faults, rather than a given distance. This information makes it possible to account for other seismic source characteristics, such as rupture mechanism and near-source effects, during selection of scenario-based ground-motion time histories for structural analysis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Ameri, F. Pacor, G. Cultrera, and G. Franceschina Deterministic Ground-Motion Scenarios for Engineering Applications: The Case of Thessaloniki, Greece Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1289 - 1303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Beauval, P.-Y. Bard, S. Hainzl, and P. Gueguen Can Strong-Motion Observations be Used to Constrain Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Estimates? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 509 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Bommer and N. A. Abrahamson Reply to "Comment on 'Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates?' by Julian J. Bommer and Norman A. Abrahamson" by Zhenming Wang and Mai Zhou Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 2215 - 2217. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Pagani and A. Marcellini Seismic-Hazard Disaggregation: A Fully Probabilistic Methodology Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1688 - 1701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Cao Disaggregation of Seismic Hazard Extended to Disaggregation of Annualized Loss Ratio Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2007; 97(1B): 305 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. P. Hong and K. Goda A Comparison of Seismic-Hazard and Risk Deaggregation Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2021 - 2039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Scherbaum, J. J. Bommer, H. Bungum, F. Cotton, and N. A. Abrahamson Composite Ground-Motion Models and Logic Trees: Methodology, Sensitivities, and Uncertainties Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1575 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Marin, J.-P. Avouac, M. Nicolas, and A. Schlupp A Probabilistic Approach to Seismic Hazard in Metropolitan France Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6): 2137 - 2163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Deaggregation in Magnitude, Distance, and Azimuth in the South and West of the Iberian Peninsula Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2177 - 2185.

				Mean and Modal {epsilon} in the Deaggregation of Probabilistic Ground Motion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1537 - 1552.

				Geographic Deaggregation of Seismic Hazard in the United States Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2001; 91(1): 13 - 26.

				E. H. Field and the SCEC Phase III Working Group Accounting for Site Effects in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California: Overview of the SCEC Phase III Report Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S1 - S31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. H. Field and M. D. Petersen A Test of Various Site-Effect Parameterizations in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S222 - S244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]