| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Geological & Atmospheric Sciences Iowa State University, 253 Science I, Ames, Iowa 50011-3212beresnev{at}iastate.edu
Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canadagma{at}ccs.carleton.ca
Abstract
The stochastic method of simulating ground motions from finite faults is validated against strong-motion data from the M 6.7 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. The finite-fault plane is subdivided into elements, each element is assigned a stochastic 
2 spectrum, and the delayed contributions from all subfaults are summed in the time domain. Simulated horizontal acceleration time histories and Fourier spectra at 28 rock sites are compared with observations. We first perform simulations using the slip distribution on the causative fault derived from strong-motion, teleseismic, GPS, and leveling data (Wald et al., 1996). We then test the performance of the method using quasi-random distributions of slip and alternative hypocenter locations; this is important because the rupture initiation point and slip distribution are in general not known for future earthquakes.
The model bias is calculated as the ratio of the simulated to the observed spectrum in the frequency band of 0.1 to 12.5 Hz, averaged over a suite of rock sites. The mean bias is within the 95% confidence limits of unity, showing that the model provides an accurate prediction of the spectral content of ground motions on average. The maximum excursion of the model bias from the unity value, when averaged over all 28 rock stations, is a factor of approximately 1.6; at most frequencies, it is below a factor of 1.4.
Interestingly, the spectral bias and the standard deviation of the stochastic simulations do not depend on whether the fault slip distribution and hypocenter location are based on data or are randomly generated. This suggests that these parameters do not affect the accuracy of predicting the average characteristics of ground motion, or they may have their predominant effect in the frequency range below about 0.1 Hz (below the range of this study). The implication is that deterministic slip models are not necessary to produce reasonably accurate simulations of the spectral content of strong ground motions. This is fortunate, because such models are not available for forecasting motions from future earthquakes. However, the directivity effects controlled by the hypocenter location are important in determining peak ground acceleration at individual sites.
Although the method is unbiased when averaged over all rock sites, the simulations at individual sites can have significant errors (generally a factor of 2 to 3), which are also frequency dependent. Factors such as local geology, site topography, or basin-propagation effects can profoundly affect the recordings at individual stations. To generate more accurate site-specific predictions, empirical responses at each site could be established.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. M. Atkinson, K. Assatourians, D. M. Boore, K. Campbell, and D. Motazedian A Guide to Differences between Stochastic Point-Source and Stochastic Finite-Fault Simulations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3192 - 3201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Galluzzo, G. Zonno, and E. Del Pezzo Stochastic Finite-Fault Ground-Motion Simulation in a Wave-Field Diffusive Regime: Case Study of the Mt. Vesuvius Volcanic Area Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1272 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Shoja-Taheri and H. Ghofrani Stochastic Finite-Fault Modeling of Strong Ground Motions from the 26 December 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 1950 - 1959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Gu and Y. K. Wen A Record-Based Method for the Generation of Tridirectional Uniform Hazard-Response Spectra and Ground Motions Using the Hilbert-Huang Transform Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1539 - 1556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Atkinson and D. M. Boore Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2181 - 2205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Motazedian Region-Specific Key Seismic Parameters for Earthquakes in Northern Iran Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2006; 96(4A): 1383 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. R. Castro and E. Ruiz-Cruz Stochastic Modeling of the 30 September 1999 Mw 7.5 Earthquake, Oaxaca, Mexico Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2259 - 2271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Motazedian and G. M. Atkinson Stochastic Finite-Fault Modeling Based on a Dynamic Corner Frequency Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2005; 95(3): 995 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Pacor, G. Cultrera, A. Mendez, and M. Cocco Finite Fault Modeling of Strong Ground Motions Using a Hybrid Deterministic-Stochastic Approach Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2005; 95(1): 225 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stochastic Finite-Fault Modeling of Ground Motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake: Application to Rock and Soil Sites with Implications for Nonlinear Site Response Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1691 - 1702.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ground Motions at Memphis and St. Louis from M 7.5-8.0 Earthquakes in the New Madrid Seismic Zone Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 1015 - 1024.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source Spectral Scaling and Stress Release Estimates Using Strong-Motion Records in Greece Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 1040 - 1059.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stochastic Simulation of Strong-Motion Records from the 15 April 1979 (M 7.1) Montenegro Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 1095 - 1101.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source Parameters of Earthquakes in Eastern and Western North America Based on Finite-Fault Modeling Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 695 - 710.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply to Comment by R. A. W. Haddon on "Evaluation of Models for Earthquake Source Spectra in Eastern North America" by Gail M. Atkinson and David M. Boore Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2000; 90(5): 1339 - 1341.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simulation of Near-Fault Strong-Ground Motion Using Hybrid Green's Functions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2000; 90(3): 566 - 586.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stochastic Modeling of California Ground Motions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2000; 90(2): 255 - 274.
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Hartzell, S. Harmsen, A. Frankel, and S. Larsen Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion: Comparison of methods and validation using strong-ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1484 - 1504. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. W. Scrivner and D. V. Helmberger Finite-difference modeling of two aftershocks of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1505 - 1518. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. A. Beresnev and G. M. Atkinson Generic finite-fault model for ground-motion prediction in eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1999; 89(3): 608 - 625. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. A. Beresnev, G. M. Atkinson, P. A. Johnson, and E. H. Field Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. II. Widespread Nonlinear response at soil sites Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1402 - 1410. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
