Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1998; v. 88; no. 6; p. 1353-1362
© 1998 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dreger, D.
Right arrow Articles by Romanowicz, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Regional and far-regional earthquake locations and source parameters using sparse broadband networks: A test on the Ridgecrest sequence

Douglas Dreger, Robert Uhrhammer, Michael Pasyanos, Joseph Franck and Barbara Romanowicz

Department of Geology and Geophysics 301 McCone Hall University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

Abstract

Events of the 1995 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence were located and source parameters were estimated using data recorded by the broadband, high-dynamic-range instrumentation of the Berkeley Digital Seismic Network (BDSN). The purpose of this study is to investigate the capability of a sparse broadband network at monitoring a region located outside of the network, as will be the case in the monitoring of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) for low-magnitude seismic events. In addition, we present a case study that is representative of the capabilities of other regional broadband networks. To assess the capability of a sparse network, we compared locations estimated from BDSN phase measurements to a "ground truth" catalog of high-quality earthquake locations derived from data recorded by the Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN). An adaptive grid search location program that utilizes the timing and azimuth of multiple-phase picks from one or more stations was used to determine the importance of the different types of data on absolute event locations. Sparse subnets of BDSN stations in the distance ranges from 250 to 500 km and 500 to 800 km were used. The results indicate that in the regional distance range, it is possible to obtain absolute event locations to within 18 km as is prescribed by the CTBT; however, in the far-regional distance range, the lower signal-to-noise levels precluded the location of the events to within the CTBT objective.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. Boatwright
The Persistence of Directivity in Small Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 1850 - 1861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. F. Clinton, E. Hauksson, and K. Solanki
An Evaluation of the SCSN Moment Tensor Solutions: Robustness of the Mw Magnitude Scale, Style of Faulting, and Automation of the Method
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1689 - 1705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
The Dependence of PGA and PGV on Distance and Magnitude Inferred from Northern California ShakeMap Data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2003; 93(5): 2043 - 2055.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
The Effect of Shallow San Francisco Bay Sediments on Waveforms Recorded during the MW 4.6 Bolinas, California, Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 465 - 479.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Feasibility of Real-Time Broadband Waveform Inversion for Simultaneous Moment Tensor and Centroid Location Determination
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 739 - 750.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Seismological Society of America.