Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1998; v. 88; no. 5; p. 1112-1126
© 1998 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurukawa, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The 1995 off-Etorofu earthquake: Joint relocation of foreshocks, the mainshock, and aftershocks and implications for the earthquake nucleation process

Nobuo Hurukawa

International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Building Research Institute, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan

Abstract

Prominent foreshock activity preceded the Mw 7.9 off-Etorofu earthquake in the Kurile Islands on 3 December 1995. Using a modified joint hypocenter determination method (Hurukawa, 1995), we simultaneously relocated foreshocks, the mainshock, and aftershocks to study the foreshock activity in detail in view of the nucleation process of a large earthquake. The distribution of relocated earthquakes and their focal mechanisms suggest that the 1995 off-Etorofu earthquake was an interplate earthquake at the boundary between the North American and Pacific plates. Its source area overlaps with those of the 1958 off-Etorofu (Mw 8.3) and the 1963 off-Urup (Mw 8.5) earthquakes.

Nine days before the occurrence of the mainshock, a first immediate foreshock of magnitude 6.4 occurred at the deepest point of the foreshock area. This event was followed by many foreshocks, including three additional M greater double equals 6 events, which occurred east and southeast of the first foreshock. The foreshock area expanded toward the trench axis with a velocity of several to several tens centimeters per second. The number of events per day increased daily, and the final size of the foreshock area was about 80 x 30 km. Eventually, the rupture of the mainshock started at the deepest point of the foreshock area. These observational facts are consistent with recent theoretical studies and laboratory experiments, in which foreshocks are regarded as the rupture of localized asperities in a broad weak zone where the nucleation of the large earthquake started.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
X. Lei
Typical phases of pre-failure damage in granitic rocks under differential compression
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 261(1): 11 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. R. Felzer, R. E. Abercrombie, and G. Ekstrom
A Common Origin for Aftershocks, Foreshocks, and Multiplets
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2004; 94(1): 88 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
The Rupture Process of the Mw 7.8 Cape Kronotsky, Kamchatka, Earthquake of 5 December 1997 and Its Relationship to Foreshocks and Aftershocks
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1619 - 1628.



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Seismological Society of America.