HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Beresnev, I. A. Articles by Johnson, P. A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Magnitude of nonlinear sediment response in Los Angeles basin during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake

Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canadaberesnev{at}ccs.carleton.ca
Department of Earth Sciences University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740field{at}usc.edu
Laboratorium Bouwfysica Departement Burgerlijke Bouwkunde Faculteit Toegepaste Wetenschappen K.U. Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 131, 3001 Heverlee, BelgiumKoen.VanDenAbeele{at}bwk.kuleuven.ac.be
EES-4, MS D-443 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545johnson{at}seismo5.lanl.gov

Abstract

The study of nonlinear site response has practical difficulties due to large ambiguities in isolating local response from other competing effects. We chose a sedimentary site LF6 in Los Angeles basin that (1) has the closest reference rock sites available, compared to other stations, allowing an accurate estimation of local amplification, and (2) illustrates clear resonance in the near surface. In our opinion, this case represents the least ambiguity in the identification of possible nonlinearity. The site responses during the Northridge, the 1987 Whittier Narrows events and the Northridge aftershocks are compared. The station shows a fundamental resonance-frequency change between the higher- and lower-amplitude motions in the entire ensemble of 17 events used. The net shear-modulus reduction during the Northridge event is a factor of 1.3 to 1.4 compared to the Whittier Narrows event and is a factor of 1.7 compared to the aftershocks. This result provides guidance of what to expect at other sites in the basin, where the nonlinear response is less easy to characterize.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Prediction of Nonlinear Soil Effects Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1609 - 1629.

				Stochastic Finite-Fault Modeling of Ground Motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake: Application to Rock and Soil Sites with Implications for Nonlinear Site Response Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1691 - 1702.

				Properties of Vertical Ground Motions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 3152 - 3164.

				Dilatancy-Induced P Waves as Evidence for Nonlinear Soil Behavior Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 854 - 862.

				Nonlinearity at California Generic Soil Sites from Modeling Recent Strong-Motion Data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 863 - 870.

				J. H. Steidl Site Response in Southern California for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S149 - S169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. W. Scrivner and D. V. Helmberger Finite-difference modeling of two aftershocks of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1505 - 1518. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Cultrera, D. M. Boore, W. B. Joyner, and C. M. Dietel Nonlinear soil response in the vicinity of the Van Normal Complex following the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1999; 89(5): 1214 - 1231. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Hartzell Variability in nonlinear sediment response during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1426 - 1437. [Abstract] [PDF]