Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1998; v. 88; no. 2; p. 512-522
© 1998 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Day, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wald, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Dynamic stress changes during earthquake rupture

Steven M. Day, Guang Yu and David J. Wald

Department of Geological Sciences San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182
U.S. Geological Survey, 525 South Wilson Avenue, Pasadena, California 91106

Abstract

We assess two competing dynamic interpretations that have been proposed for the short slip durations characteristic of kinematic earthquake models derived by inversion of earthquake waveform and geodetic data. The first interpretation would require a fault constitutive relationship in which rapid dynamic restrengthening of the fault surface occurs after passage of the rupture front, a hypothesized mechanical behavior that has been referred to as "self-healing." The second interpretation would require sufficient spatial heterogeneity of stress drop to permit rapid equilibration of elastic stresses with the residual dynamic friction level, a condition we refer to as "geometrical constraint." These interpretations imply contrasting predictions for the time dependence of the fault-plane shear stresses. We compare these predictions with dynamic shear stress changes for the 1992 Landers (M 7.3), 1994 Northridge (M 6.7), and 1995 Kobe (M 6.9) earthquakes. Stress changes are computed from kinematic slip models of these earthquakes, using a finite-difference method. For each event, static stress drop is highly variable spatially, with high stress-drop patches embedded in a background of low, and largely negative, stress drop. The time histories of stress change show predominantly monotonic stress change after passage of the rupture front, settling to a residual level, without significant evidence for dynamic restrengthening. The stress change at the rupture front is usually gradual rather than abrupt, probably reflecting the limited resolution inherent in the underlying kinematic inversions. On the basis of this analysis, as well as recent similar results obtained independently for the Kobe and Morgan Hill earthquakes, we conclude that, at the present time, the self-healing hypothesis is unnecessary to explain earthquake kinematics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. P. Mavroeidis and A. S. Papageorgiou
Effect of Fault Rupture Characteristics on Near-Fault Strong Ground Motions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2010; 100(1): 37 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. P. Ely, S. M. Day, and J.-B. Minster
Dynamic Rupture Models for the Southern San Andreas Fault
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2010; 100(1): 131 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. Pitarka, L. A. Dalguer, S. M. Day, P. G. Somerville, and K. Dan
Numerical Study of Ground-Motion Differences between Buried-Rupturing and Surface-Rupturing Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1521 - 1537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. J. Lovely, D. D. Pollard, and O. Mutlu
Regions of Reduced Static Stress Drop near Fault Tips for Large Strike-Slip Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1691 - 1704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. A. Dalguer, H. Miyake, S. M. Day, and K. Irikura
Surface Rupturing and Buried Dynamic-Rupture Models Calibrated with Statistical Observations of Past Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1147 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X. Lu, N. Lapusta, and A. J. Rosakis
From the Cover: Pulse-like and crack-like ruptures in experiments mimicking crustal earthquakes
PNAS, November 27, 2007; 104(48): 18931 - 18936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. R. Johnson and R. M. Nadeau
Asperity Model of an Earthquake: Dynamic Problem
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2005; 95(1): 75 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. Spudich and M. Guatteri
The Effect of Bandwidth Limitations on the Inference of Earthquake Slip-Weakening Distance from Seismograms
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6): 2028 - 2036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Generation of New Cracks Accompanied by the Dynamic Shear Rupture Propagation of the 2000 Tottori (Japan) Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2003; 93(5): 2236 - 2252.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. P. Mavroeidis and A. S. Papageorgiou
A Mathematical Representation of Near-Fault Ground Motions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1099 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Stress-Breakdown Time and Slip-Weakening Distance Inferred from Slip-Velocity Functions on Earthquake Faults
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 264 - 282.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Stochastic Fault Stress: Implications for Fault Dynamics and Ground Motion
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 3006 - 3021.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Effect of a Shallow Weak Zone on Fault Rupture: Numerical Simulation of Scale-Model Experiments
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 3022 - 3041.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Source Spectral Scaling and Stress Release Estimates Using Strong-Motion Records in Greece
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 1040 - 1059.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
The 1999 Izmit, Turkey, Earthquake: A 3D Dynamic Stress Transfer Model of Intraearthquake Triggering
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 245 - 255.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Dynamic Earthquake Ruptures in the Presence of Lithostatic Normal Stresses: Implications for Friction Models and Heat Production
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1765 - 1796.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Earthquake Doublet in Kagoshima, Japan: Rupture of Asperities in a Stress Shadow
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2001; 91(1): 112 - 127.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Rupture Pulse Characterization: Self-Healing, Self-Similar, Expanding Solutions in a Continuum Model of Fault Dynamics
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6): 1480 - 1497.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
What Can Strong-Motion Data Tell Us about Slip-Weakening Fault-Friction Laws?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2000; 90(1): 98 - 116.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. Zheng and J. R. Rice
Conditions under which velocity-weakening friction allows a self-healing versus a cracklike mode of rupture
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1466 - 1483.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. Shi, A. Anooshehpoor, J. N. Brune, and Y. Zeng
Dynamics of thrust faulting: 2D lattice model
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1484 - 1494.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Y. Ben-Zion and D. J. Andrews
Properties and implications of dynamic rupture along a material interface
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1998; 88(4): 1085 - 1094.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. Spudich, M. Guatteri, K. Otsuki, and J. Minagawa
Use of fault striations and dislocation models to infer tectonic shear stress during the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1998; 88(2): 413 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Seismological Society of America.