Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1998; v. 88; no. 1; p. 18-29
© 1998 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, L.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Fehler, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Accuracy analysis of the split-step Fourier propagator: Implications for seismic modeling and migration

Lian-Jie Huang and Michael C. Fehler

Los Alamos National Laboratory, EES-4, MS D443, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545

Abstract

The split-step Fourier propagator is a one-way wave propagation method that has been widely used to simulate primary forward and backward (reflected) deterministic/random wave propagation due to its fast computational speed and limited computer memory requirement. The method is useful for rapid modeling of seismic-wave propagation in heterogeneous media where forward scattered waveforms can be considered to be dominant or reverberations can be ignored. The method is based on a solution to the one-way wave equation that requires expanding the square root of an operator and splitting of the resulting noncommutative operators to allow calculation by transferring wave fields between the space and wavenumber domains. Previous analysis of the accuracy of the method has focused on the error related to only a portion of the approximations involved in the propagator. To better understand the accuracy of the propagator, we present a complete formal and numerical accuracy analyses. Our formal analysis indicates that the dominant error of the propagator increases as the first order in the marching interval. We show that nonsymmetrically and symmetrically split-step marching solutions have the same first-order error term. Their second- and third-order error terms are similar. Therefore, the differences between the accuracy of different split-step marching solutions are insignificant. This conclusion is confirmed by our numerical tests. The relation among the phase error of the split-step Fourier propagator, relative velocity perturbation, and propagation angle is numerically studied. The results suggest that the propagator is accurate for up to a 60° propagation angle from the main propagation direction for media with small relative velocity perturbations (10%).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L.-Y. Fu
Comparison of Different One-Way Propagators for Wave Forward Propagation in Heterogeneous Crustal Wave Guides
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1091 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Envelope Broadening of Outgoing Waves in 2D Random Media: A Comparison between the Markov Approximation and Numerical Simulations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2000; 90(4): 914 - 928.


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Seismic Wave Propagation and Scattering in Heterogeneous Crustal Waveguides Using Screen Propagators: I SH Waves
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2000; 90(2): 401 - 413.



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Seismological Society of America.