Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1997; v. 87; no. 5; p. 1220-1229
© 1997 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molchan, G.
Right arrow Articles by Panza, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Multi-scale seismicity model for seismic risk

George Molchan, Tatiana Kronrod and Giuliano F. Panza

International Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics, Warshavskoye sh., 79, kor.2, Moscow 113556, Russia
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, via Weiss, 4, 34127 Trieste, Italy
International Center for Theoretical Physics SAND Group, P.O. Box 586, 34100 Trieste, Italy

Abstract

For a general use of the frequency-magnitude (FM) relation in seismic risk assessment, we formulate a multi-scale approach that relies on the hypothesis that only the ensemble of events that are geometrically small, compared with the elements of the seismotectonic regionalization, can be described by a log-linear FM relation. It follows that the seismic zonation must be performed at several scales, depending upon the self-similarity conditions of the seismic events and the linearity of the log FM relation, in the magnitude range of interest. The analysis of worldwide seismicity, using the Harvard catalog, where the seismic moment is recorded as the earthquake size, corroborates the idea that a single FM relation is not universally applicable. The multi-scale model of the FM relation is tested in the Italian region.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J.-U. Klugel
Comment on "Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates?" by Julian J. Bommer and Norman A. Abrahamson
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 2198 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Seismological Society of America.