HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ward, S. N. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

More on M_max

Institute of Tectonics University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064

Abstract

M_max the maximum magnitude earthquake that a fault is likely to suffer, plays an important role in earthquake hazard estimation. Although observational evidence summarized in plots of characteristic earthquake magnitude (M_char) versus fault length indicate that smaller faults produce lower magnitude events, an argument has been made that any fault regardless of its length should have M_max near magnitude 8. The rationale for this argument charges that the contrary observational evidence stems from historical catalogs of limited extent and that it largely excludes nonconventional earthquakes in which several short and apparently disconnected fault segments fail simultaneously. This article addresses M_max using computer models of rupture on faults of various strengths and configurations. Computer models have advantages in that (a) M_max earthquakes always can be generated by forcing complete stress drop on fully stressed faults, thus avoiding the limitations of short historical catalogs, and (b) the circumstances necessary for the failure of several segments to contribute to a large M_max can be investigated quantitatively. I find that for a strikeslip California environment, it is physically unlikely for an M 8 event to break less than 300 to 400 km of fault. Were this M 8 rupture to occur on as few as five independent segments, shear strength of the participating faults would have to be raised to implausible levels. If the fault segments are not independent and their coseismic stress fields interact, then amplifications in slip are possible without drastic increase in strength. The range of fault geometries where strong interactions and amplifications of stress occur, however, is very restricted, and discontinuous faults separated by even 5% of their length act more or less independently. M_max earthquakes breading realistic-looking distributions of discontinuous faults rarely are more than 0.1-magnitude unit bigger than would be predicted from a moment summation based on the characteristic magnitude M_char of each of the individual faults. A prudent course in hazard analysis differentiates M_max from M_char allowing M_max to be 0.2 to 0.3 units larger than M_char but not automatically equal to 8.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. N. Ward Dogtails versus rainbows: Synthetic earthquake rupture models as an aid in interpreting geological data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1997; 87(6): 1422 - 1441. [Abstract] [PDF]