HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sornette, D. Articles by Knopoff, L. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The paradox of the expected time until the next earthquake

Department of Earth and Space Sciences and Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095
Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière Condensée CNRS URA190 Université des Sciences, B.P. 70, Parc Valrose, 06108 Nice Cedex 2, France
Department of Physics and Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095

Abstract

We show analytically that the answer to the question, (can it be that) "The longer it has been since the last earthquake, the longer the expected time till the next?" depends crucially on the statistics of the fluctuations in the interval times between earthquakes. The periodic, uniform, semi-Gaussian, Rayleigh, and truncated statistical distributions of interval times, as well as the Weibull distributions with exponent greater than 1, all have decreasing expected time to the next earthquake with increasing time since the last one, for long times since the last earthquake; the lognormal and power-law distributions and the Weibull distributions with exponents smaller than 1 have increasing times to the next earthquake as the elapsed time since the last increases, for long elapsed times. There is an identifiable crossover between these models, which is gauged by the rate of fall-off of the long-term tail of the distribution in comparison with an exponential fall-off. The response to the question for short elapsed times is also evaluated. The lognormal and power-law distributions give one response for short elapsed times and the opposite for long elapsed times. Even the sampling of a finite number of intervals from a Poisson distribution will lead to an increasing estimate of time to the next earthquake for increasing elapsed time since the last one.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Zoller and S. Hainzl Recurrence Time Distributions of Large Earthquakes in a Stochastic Model for Coupled Fault Systems: The Role of Fault Interaction Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1679 - 1687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Yakovlev, D. L. Turcotte, J. B. Rundle, and P. B. Rundle Simulation-Based Distributions of Earthquake Recurrence Times on the San Andreas Fault System Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 1995 - 2007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Rundle, P. B. Rundle, A. Donnellan, D. L. Turcotte, R. Shcherbakov, P. Li, B. D. Malamud, L. B. Grant, G. C. Fox, D. McLeod, et al. A simulation-based approach to forecasting the next great San Francisco earthquake PNAS, October 25, 2005; 102(43): 15363 - 15367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Brownian Model for Recurrent Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2233 - 2250.

				A Power-Law Function for Earthquake Interarrival Time and Magnitude Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2002; 92(5): 1783 - 1794.

				Mapping Seismic Quiescence in California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2001; 91(1): 64 - 81.