Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1997; v. 87; no. 3; p. 745-754
© 1997 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peng, X.
Right arrow Articles by Humphreys, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Moho dip and crustal anisotropy in northwestern Nevada from teleseismic receiver functions

Xiaohua Peng and Eugene D. Humphreys

Department of Geological Science University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403

Abstract

Receiver functions are derived from teleseismic waves recorded during the 1988 to 1989 PASSCAL Basin and Range passive-source seismic experiment in northwestern Nevada. A velocity model involving both a planar dipping Moho and crustal anisotropy is needed to explain the radial and tangential motions of the observed PS conversions. An arrival-time difference often observed between radial and tangential Moho PS conversions suggests an anisotropic crust. The PS conversions are large and indicate a major discontinuity under the area. The particle motion directions for most of the tangential components change sign between South American events and events from the other two source areas (Japan and Tonga regions), providing good evidence for a Moho dipping approximately to the north. Also, the PS conversions from the Moho follow direct P arrivals by about 3.2 sec under the southern part of the array, 3.4 sec under the southern central part of the array, and 3.7 sec under the northern part of the array, indicating a Moho that varies in depth from about 26 to 31 km. A velocity model with the Moho dipping ~9° in a nearly northerly direction and an anisotropic crust with a split time of ~0.25 sec and a fast axis of ~130° best explain these observations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. P. Ligorria and C. J. Ammon
Iterative deconvolution and receiver-function estimation
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1999; 89(5): 1395 - 1400.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Seismological Society of America.