Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1997; v. 87; no. 3; p. 668-683
© 1997 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bour, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cara, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Test of a simple empirical Green's function method on moderate-sized earthquakes

M. Bour and M. Cara

Institut de Physique du Globe de Strasbourg Université Louis Pasteur-CNRS, 5, rue René Descartes, 67084, Strasbourg Cedex, France

Abstract

In regions of low to moderate seismicity, accelerometric data may be scarce or nonexistant. This makes it difficult to use empirical or semi-empirical methods for estimating the strong ground motion of a potentially damaging earthquake. When a few small events are nevertheless well recorded locally, we propose to use a simple empirical Green's function method to obtain rough strong-motion estimates for a hypothetical magnitude 5 to 7 earthquake. The method is equivalent to applying a source-dependent linear filter to the small-event records. At low frequencies, tests with synthetics computed for a circular fault model show that the method may be valid at distances of a few fault lengths from the source, but it fails at predicting the near-field terms at shorter distances. Spatial aliasing problems, due to the sampling of the large-event fault surface with a finite series of subfaults, put another limit at high frequencies. Applying the method to an earthquake sequence in central California, we also show that uncertainties in the small-event source parameters may cause important errors in the strong-motion prediction. Despite these quite severe limitations, we consider that rough estimations of strong ground motion are possible by making a series of hypotheses on the source process. We show, for example, using a small earthquake recorded at the surface and in a 500-m-deep borehole, how the SH strong-motion acceleration spectra could be estimated at depth, next to a mine, and at the surface, for a hypothetical M 6.5 earthquake in the sediment-filled valley of the upper Rhine Grabben.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. Di Alessandro and J. Boatwright
A Stochastic Estimate of Ground Motion at Oceano, California, for the M 6.5 22 December 2003 San Simeon Earthquake, Derived from Aftershock Recordings
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2006; 96(4A): 1437 - 1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. Kohrs-Sansorny, F. Courboulex, M. Bour, and A. Deschamps
A Two-Stage Method for Ground-Motion Simulation Using Stochastic Summation of Small Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1387 - 1400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Hartzell, S. Harmsen, A. Frankel, and S. Larsen
Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion: Comparison of methods and validation using strong-ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1484 - 1504.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Seismological Society of America.