| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Center for Earthquake Research and Information The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38152
U.S. Geological Survey, and Center for Earthquake Research and Information The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38152
Instituto de Geofísica, and Instituto de Ingeniería UNAM, 04510 México D.F., México
Centro Nacional de Prevención de Desastres, Delfin Madrigal 665, 04650 México, D.F., México
Abstract
We study the spatial variation in earthquake ground motions, or equivalently the dynamic displacement gradient field, using a novel analysis procedure borrowed from geodesy. Seismic data recorded in the Valley of Mexico by a microarray of three three-component surface accelerographs and two three-component accelerographs at depths of 30 m and 102 m constrain our estimates of the dynamic displacement gradient field (from which strains and rotations derive) for four moderate earthquakes at distances of 250 to 300 km. Our study focuses on the effects of low-velocity surface materials on the deformation. At the surface, the gradients corresponding to deformation across vertical planes dominate, and vertical-axis rotations are of similar magnitudes as strains. The greatest peak surface gradient we observed was 206 µstrain for the 14 September 1995 MW 7.5 earthquake at a distance of 
300 km. However, much larger gradients occur across horizontal planes (
u/z, where u is a horizontal displacement and z is depth) at some depth between 0 and 30 m. These values are about a factor 10 greater than the corresponding gradient components at the surface. u/z for the 14 September earthquake equaled or exceeded 665 µstrain at depth. The dynamic deformations experienced in Mexico City undoubtedly have occurred before and will occur again in other densely populated areas. However, in many other regions, the sediment response will not remain linear and elastic, resulting instead in liquefaction and ground failure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Spudich and J. B. Fletcher Observation and Prediction of Dynamic Ground Strains, Tilts, and Torsions Caused by the Mw 6.0 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake and Aftershocks, Derived from UPSAR Array Observations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1898 - 1914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A. Langston Wave Gradiometry in Two Dimensions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 401 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A. Langston Spatial Gradient Analysis for Linear Seismic Arrays Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2007; 97(1B): 265 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Suryanto, H. Igel, J. Wassermann, A. Cochard, B. Schuberth, D. Vollmer, F. Scherbaum, U. Schreiber, and A. Velikoseltsev First Comparison of Array-Derived Rotational Ground Motions with Direct Ring Laser Measurements Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2059 - 2071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A. Langston, P. Bodin, C. Powell, M. Withers, S. Horton, and W. Mooney Explosion Source Strong Ground Motions in the Mississippi Embayment Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1038 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Iida and H. Kawase A Comprehensive Interpretation of Strong Motions in the Mexican Volcanic Belt Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2004; 94(2): 598 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Systematic Method for Analyzing Borehole Recordings to Estimate the Wavefield in the Lakebed Zone of Mexico City Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2000; 90(5): 1268 - 1280.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Energy Partitioning and the Diffusive Character of the Seismic Coda Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2000; 90(3): 655 - 665.
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gomberg, G. Pavlis, and P. Bodin The strain in the array is mainly in the plane (waves below ~1 Hz) Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1428 - 1438. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Kinoshita A stochastic method for investigating site effects by means of a borehole array--SH and Love waves Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1999; 89(2): 484 - 500. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Lomnitz, J. Flores, O. Novaro, T. H. Seligman, and R. Esquivel Seismic coupling of interface modes in sedimentary basins: A recipe for disaster Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1999; 89(1): 14 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. P. McLeod, G. E. Stedman, T. H. Webb, and U. Schreiber Comparison of standard and ring laser rotational seismograms Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1495 - 1503. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. K. Singh, M. Santoyo, P. Bodin, and J. Gomberg Dynamic deformations of shallow sediments in the Valley of Mexico, Part II: Single-station estimates Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1997; 87(3): 540 - 550. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
