Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1996; v. 86; no. 6; p. 1964-1978
© 1996 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beresnev, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, K.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Nonlinear soil response—A reality?

Igor A. Beresnev and Kuo-Liang Wen

Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
Institute of Earth Sciences Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 1-55, Nankang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan

Abstract

Geotechnical models consistently indicate that the stress-strain relationship of soils is nonlinear and hysteretic, especially at shear strains larger than ~10–5 to 10–4. Nonlinear effects, such as an increase in damping and reduction in shear-wave velocity as excitation strength increases, are commonly recognized in the dynamic loading of soils. On the other hand, these effects are usually ignored in seismological models of ground-motion prediction because of the lack of compelling corroborative evidence from strong-motion observations. The situation is being changed by recently obtained data. Explicit evidence of strong-motion deamplification, accompanied by changes in resonant frequencies, are found in the data from the 1985 Michoacan, Mexico, and the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquakes, the events recorded by the vertical and surface accelerograph arrays in Taiwan, as well as a number of other events throughout the world. Evidence of nonlinear behavior becomes apparent beyond a threshold acceleration of ~100 to 200 gal. Nonlinearity is considerable in cohesionless soil but may be negligible in stiff soils. The findings of recent years indicate that nonlinear site effects are more common than previously recognized in strong-motion seismology.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. Edwards, A. Rietbrock, J. J. Bommer, and B. Baptie
The Acquisition of Source, Path, and Site Effects from Microearthquake Recordings Using Q Tomography: Application to the United Kingdom
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1915 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Z. Lawrence, P. Bodin, C. A. Langston, F. Pearce, J. Gomberg, P. A. Johnson, F.-Y. Menq, and T. Brackman
Induced Dynamic Nonlinear Ground Response at Garner Valley, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1412 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. J. Bommer, P. J. Stafford, J. E. Alarcon, and S. Akkar
The Influence of Magnitude Range on Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 2152 - 2170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. F. Bonilla, R. J. Archuleta, and D. Lavallee
Hysteretic and Dilatant Behavior of Cohesionless Soils and Their Effects on Nonlinear Site Response: Field Data Observations and Modeling
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2373 - 2395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Estimating Slab Earthquake Response Spectra from a 3D Q Model
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2003; 93(6): 2649 - 2663.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Stochastic Finite-Fault Modeling of Ground Motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake: Application to Rock and Soil Sites with Implications for Nonlinear Site Response
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1691 - 1702.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Signatures of the Seismic Source in EMD-Based Characterization of the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake Recordings
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 501 - 518.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Properties of Vertical Ground Motions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 3152 - 3164.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Nonlinear and Linear Site Response and Basin Effects in Seattle for the M 6.8 Nisqually, Washington, Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2090 - 2109.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Changes in Shear Moduli of Liquefied and Nonliquefied Soils during the 1995 Kobe Earthquake and Its Aftershocks at Three Vertical-Array Sites
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2002; 92(5): 1952 - 1969.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Ground Motions at Memphis and St. Louis from M 7.5-8.0 Earthquakes in the New Madrid Seismic Zone
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 1015 - 1024.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Dilatancy-Induced P Waves as Evidence for Nonlinear Soil Behavior
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 854 - 862.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Two Mw 4.8 Cerro Prieto, Baja California, Mexico, Earthquakes on 1 June and 10 September 1999: Strong-Motion Observations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1456 - 1470.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Field and the SCEC Phase III Working Group
Accounting for Site Effects in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California: Overview of the SCEC Phase III Report
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S1 - S31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. H. Steidl
Site Response in Southern California for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S149 - S169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Field
A Modified Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationship for Southern California that Accounts for Detailed Site Classification and a Basin-Depth Effect
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S209 - S221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Integrated Use of Seismograph and Strong-Motion Data to Determine Soil Amplification: Response of the Fraser River Delta to the Duvall and Georgia Strait Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2000; 90(4): 1028 - 1040.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Nonlinear Site Response in Kushiro during the 1994 Hokkaido Toho-oki Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2000; 90(4): 1082 - 1095.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Considering Nonlinear Site Effect
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2000; 90(1): 66 - 72.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. Xu, S. M. Day, and J.-B. H. Minster
Two-dimensional linear and nonlinear wave propagation in a half-space
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1999; 89(4): 903 - 917.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. A. Beresnev, G. M. Atkinson, P. A. Johnson, and E. H. Field
Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. II. Widespread Nonlinear response at soil sites
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1402 - 1410.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Hartzell
Variability in nonlinear sediment response during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1426 - 1437.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. A. Beresnev, E. H. Field, K. Van Den Abeele, and P. A. Johnson
Magnitude of nonlinear sediment response in Los Angeles basin during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1998; 88(4): 1079 - 1084.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Jongmans, K. Pitilakis, D. Demanet, D. Raptakis, J. Riepl, C. Horrent, G. Tsokas, K. Lontzetidis, and P.-Y. Bard
EURO-SEISTEST: Determination of the geological structure of the Volvi basin and validation of the basin response
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1998; 88(2): 473 - 487.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. C. Harmsen
Determination of site amplification in the Los Angeles urban area from inversion of strong-motion records
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1997; 87(4): 866 - 887.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Seismological Society of America.