Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1996; v. 86; no. 6; p. 1845-1852
© 1996 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mori, J.
Right arrow Articles by Helmberger, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Large-amplitude Moho reflections (SmS) from Landers aftershocks, southern California

Jim Mori and Donald Helmberger

U.S. Geological Survey, 525 South Wilson Ave., Pasadena, California 91106
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125

Abstract

Closely spaced aftershocks of the 28 June 1992 Landers earthquake (Mw 7.3) were used to make event record sections that show the transverse components of S and SmS arrivals at a distance of 70 to 170 km. For the data recorded toward the north in the Mojave desert, large SmS phases are observed with amplitudes 2 to 5 times greater than the direct S. For similar distances to the south, the SmS arrival is comparable to or smaller than the S. Comparisons to synthetic seismograms indicate that the large-amplitude SmS phases are produced by the simple crustal structure of the Mojave desert that allows a large Moho reflection. In contrast, the more complex geologic structure to the south partitions the seismic energy into a more complicated set of seismic phases, so that the Moho reflection is diminished in amplitude. The large SmS phases observed in the Mojave enhance the overall ground motions by a factor of 2 to 3. This suggests that when damaging earthquakes occur in other regions of simple crustal structures, Moho reflections will produce amplified strong motions at distance ranges around 100 km depending on the local structure.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K.-S. Liu and Y.-B. Tsai
Large Effects of Moho Reflections (SmS) on Peak Ground Motion in Northwestern Taiwan
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2009; 99(1): 255 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. I. Allen, P. R. Cummins, T. Dhu, and J. F. Schneider
Attenuation of Ground-Motion Spectral Amplitudes in Southeastern Australia
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1279 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
S. E. Hough
Remotely triggered earthquakes following moderate main shocks
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 425(0): 73 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Bindi, S. Parolai, H. Grosser, C. Milkereit, and S. Karakisa
Crustal Attenuation Characteristics in Northwestern Turkey in the Range from 1 to 10 Hz
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2006; 96(1): 200 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
S. E. Hough
Remotely Triggered Earthquakes Following Moderate Mainshocks (or, Why California Is Not Falling into the Ocean)
Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2005; 76(1): 58 - 66.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Assessment of the Site Conditions of Precariously Balanced Rocks in the Mojave Desert, Southern California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2139 - 2144.



Home page
ScienceHome page
Y. Li, J. E. Vidale, K. Aki, F. Xu, and T. Burdette
Evidence of Shallow Fault Zone Strengthening After the 1992?M7.5 Landers, California, Earthquake
Science, January 9, 1998; 279(5348): 217 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Seismological Society of America.