| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, 801 K Street, MS 12-31, Sacramento, California 95814
Abstract
We analyzed the historical seismicity in southern California to develop a rational approach for calculating the seismic hazard from background seismicity of magnitude 6.5 or smaller. The basic assumption for the approach is that future earthquakes will be clustered spatially near locations of historical mainshocks of magnitudes equal to or greater than 4. We analyzed the declustered California seismicity catalog to compute the rate of earthquakes on a grid and then smoothed these rates to account for the spatial distribution of future earthquakes. To find a suitable spatial smoothing function, we studied the distance (r) correlation for southern California earthquakes and found that they follow a 1/rµ power-law relation, where µ increases with magnitude. This result suggests that larger events are more clustered in space than smaller earthquakes. Assuming the seismicity follows the Gutenberg-Richter distribution, we calculated peak ground accelerations (PGA) for 10% probability of exceedance in 50 yr. PGA estimates range between 0.25 and 0.35 g across much of southern California. These ground-motion levels are generally less than half the levels of hazard that are obtained using the entire seismic source model that also includes geologic and geodetic data. We also calculated the overall uncertainty for the hazard map using a Monte Carlo method and found that the coefficient of variation is about 0.24 ± 0.01 for much of the region.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Beauval, S. Hainzl, and F. Scherbaum The Impact of the Spatial Uniform Distribution of Seismicity on Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Estimation Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2465 - 2471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Cao, M. D. Petersen, and A. D. Frankel Model Uncertainties of the 2002 Update of California Seismic Hazard Maps Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2040 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Methodology for Distributed Seismicity Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2003; 93(6): 2502 - 2515.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Aftershocks and Their Importance for Aftershock Forecasting Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1433 - 1448.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adaptive Kernel Estimation and Continuous Probability Representation of Historical Earthquake Catalogs Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 904 - 912.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of Seismicity Models Generated by Different Kernel Estimations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 913 - 922.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discrepancy between Earthquake Rates Implied by Historic Earthquakes and a Consensus Geologic Source Model for California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2000; 90(5): 1117 - 1132.
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. S. Stein and T. C. Hanks M greater double equals 6 earthquakes in southern California during the twentieth century: No evidence for a seismicity or moment deficit Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1998; 88(3): 635 - 652. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Petersen, W. A. Bryant, C. H. Cramer, M. S. Reichle, and C. R. Real Seismic ground-motion hazard mapping incorporating site effects for Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura counties, California: A geographical information system application Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1997; 87(1): 249 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
