Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1996; v. 86; no. 5; p. 1292-1299
© 1996 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bodin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Brune, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

On the scaling of slip with rupture length for shallow strike-slip earthquakes: Quasi-static models and dynamic rupture propagation

Paul Bodin and James N. Brune

Center for Earthquake Research and Information The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38152
Seismological Laboratory Mackay School of Mines University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557

Abstract

We explore whether observations of average surface rupture properties among strike-slip earthquakes reflect the underlying mechanics. We compare the observed relationship between average slip and rupture length for 27 surface ruptures (18 plate-boundary earthquakes and 9 away from transform plate boundaries) with predictions from two families of uniform-stress-drop models. Purely elastic models with a rupture-limiting locking depth predict a nonlinear relationship while a quasidynamic model with no locking depth predicts a linear relationship. We explore whether observations of fault slip at the Earth's surface distinguish which, if either, of these two families of models may be favored. We find that the data provide insufficient constraints to rule out either a linear or a nonlinear relationship. This might arise from uncertainties in the observations or from reasonable (but unrecoverable) variations in locking depths and uniform stress drops among earthquakes. We advance an alternative interpretation that the complexity among the observations is consistent with dynamic rupture models featuring spatially varying stress drops.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. Hillers and S. G. Wesnousky
Scaling Relations of Strike-Slip Earthquakes with Different Slip-Rate-Dependent Properties at Depth
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1085 - 1101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. C. P. King and S. G. Wesnousky
Scaling of Fault Parameters for Continental Strike-Slip Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 1833 - 1840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. J. Wilkins and R. A. Schultz
3D Cohesive End-Zone Model for Source Scaling of Strike-Slip Interplate Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2232 - 2258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. A. Ozacar and S. L. Beck
The 2002 Denali Fault and 2001 Kunlun Fault Earthquakes: Complex Rupture Processes of Two Large Strike-Slip Events
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6B): S278 - S292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Aftershock Zone Scaling
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 641 - 655.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Source Scaling Properties from Finite-Fault-Rupture Models
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2000; 90(3): 604 - 615.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Seismological Society of America.