Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1996; v. 86; no. 4; p. 1130-1148
© 1996 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beeler, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tullis, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Self-healing slip pulses in dynamic rupture models due to velocity-dependent strength

N. M. Beeler* and T. E. Tullis

Department of Geological Sciences Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912

Abstract

Seismological observations of short slip duration on faults (short rise time on seismograms) during earthquakes are not consistent with conventional crack models of dynamic rupture and fault slip. In these models, the leading edge of rupture stops only when a strong region is encountered, and slip at an interior point ceases only when waves from the stopped edge of slip propagate back to that point. In contrast, some seismological evidence suggests that the duration of slip is too short for waves to propagate from the nearest edge of the ruptured surface, perhaps even if the distance used is an asperity size instead of the entire rupture dimension. What controls slip duration, if not dimensions of the fault or of asperities?

In this study, dynamic earthquake rupture and slip are represented by a propagating shear crack. For all propagating shear cracks, slip velocity is highest near the rupture front, and at a small distance behind the rupture front, the slip velocity decreases. As pointed out by Heaton (1990), if the crack obeys a negative slip-rate-dependent strength relation, the lower slip velocity behind the rupture front will lead to strengthening that further reduces the velocity, and under certain circumstances, healing of slip can occur. The boundary element method of Hamano (1974) is used in a program adapted from Andrews (1985) for numerical simulations of mode II rupture with two different velocity-dependent strength functions. For the first function, after a slip-weakening displacement, the crack follows an exponential velocity-weakening relation. The characteristic velocity V0 of the exponential determines the magnitude of the velocity-dependence at dynamic velocities. The velocity-dependence at high velocity is essentially zero when V0 is small and the resulting slip velocity distribution is similar to slip weakening. If V0 is larger, rupture propagation initially resembles slip-weakening, but spontaneous healing occurs behind the rupture front. The rise time and rupture propagation velocity depend on the choice of constitutive parameters. The second strength function is a natural log velocity-dependent form similar to constitutive laws that fit experimental rock friction data at lower velocities. Slip pulses also arise with this function. For a reasonable choice of constitutive parameters, slip pulses with this function do not propagate at speeds greater than the Raleighwave velocity. The calculated slip pulses are similar in many aspects to seismic observations of short rise time. In all cases of self-healing slip pulses, the residual stress increases with distance behind the trailing edge of the pulse so that the final stress drop is much less than the dynamic stress drop, in agreement with the model of Brune (1976) and some recent seismological observations of rupture.

Footnotes

* Present address: U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd. MS-977, Menlo Park, California 94025.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
C. A. J. Wibberley, G. Yielding, and G. Di Toro
Recent advances in the understanding of fault zone internal structure: a review
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 299(1): 5 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X. Lu, N. Lapusta, and A. J. Rosakis
From the Cover: Pulse-like and crack-like ruptures in experiments mimicking crustal earthquakes
PNAS, November 27, 2007; 104(48): 18931 - 18936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
G. Lykotrafitis, A. J. Rosakis, and G. Ravichandran
Self-healing pulse-like shear ruptures in the laboratory.
Science, September 22, 2006; 313(5794): 1765 - 1768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. R. Rice, C. G. Sammis, and R. Parsons
Off-Fault Secondary Failure Induced by a Dynamic Slip Pulse
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2005; 95(1): 109 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Rupture Pulse Characterization: Self-Healing, Self-Similar, Expanding Solutions in a Continuum Model of Fault Dynamics
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6): 1480 - 1497.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. Inoue and T. Miyatake
3D simulation of near-field strong ground motion based on dynamic modeling
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1445 - 1456.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. Zheng and J. R. Rice
Conditions under which velocity-weakening friction allows a self-healing versus a cracklike mode of rupture
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1466 - 1483.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. M. Day, G. Yu, and D. J. Wald
Dynamic stress changes during earthquake rupture
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1998; 88(2): 512 - 522.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Seismological Society of America.