|
|
||||||||
Seismographic Station University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Department of Geology and Geophysics University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Center for Computational Seismology Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
Department of Earth and Environmental Science and Geophysical Research Center New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801
Abstract
Nearly two-thirds of the microseismicity occurring at Parkfield, California, consists of repeating clusters of closely located events exhibiting waveform cross-correlation values exceeding 0.95. This observation, coupled with a high probability for an M
6 earthquake within the next decade (Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, 1988), make this segment of the San Andreas fault system a prime location to search for temporal variations in coda Q associated with crustal changes that may occur during the earthquake cycle. The coda comparison analysis method described in Part 1 of this study (Aster et al., 1996) is applied to data from four borehole stations of the Parkfield High Resolution Seismic Network (HRSN) for the period January 1987 through February 1994. We examine 21 of the nearly 300 repeating clusters observed to date. The restriction of the data set to only the most highly similar sources is observed to be critical; small differences in the source process, even for event pairs with centroid locations within approximately 20 m, significantly increase the spurious noise level in the parameter estimates. Absolute 68% confidence bound estimates obtained on the repeatability of coda Q for all microearthquake pairs are ±10% for frequencies below 20 Hz. Tighter constraints are obtainable by reconstructing the temporal history of coda Q from the first difference measurements between microearthquake pairs. These functional reconstructions show that the mean value of coda Q has not varied by more than approximately 5% from 3 to 30 Hz at the 1
level during the study period. However, other observables, such as an increased level of microseismicity, suggest that a preparatory stage for the next Parkfield earthquake has begun, indicating that coda Q is so far showing no sign of sensitivity to preparatory processes at Parkfield.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Del Pezzo, F. Bianco, S. Petrosino, and G. Saccorotti Changes in the Coda Decay Rate and Shear-Wave Splitting Parameters Associated with Seismic Swarms at Mt. Vesuvius, Italy Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2004; 94(2): 439 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Seismological Studies at Parkfield VIII: Modeling the Observed Travel-Time Changes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2000; 90(3): 702 - 708. |
||||
![]() |
G-A. Tselentis Evidence for stability in coda Q associated with the Egion (central Greece) earthquake of 15 June 1995 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1997; 87(6): 1679 - 1684. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Karageorgi, T. V. McEvilly, and R. Clymer Seismological studies at Parkfield IV: Variations in controlled-source waveform parameters and their correlation with seismicity, 1987 to 1995 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1997; 87(1): 39 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |