Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1996; v. 86; no. 2; p. 519-523
© 1996 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beresnev, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, K.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The accuracy of soil response estimates using soil-to-rock spectral ratios

Igor A. Beresnev and Kuo-Liang Wen

Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
Institute of Earth Sciences Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 1-55, Nankang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan

Abstract

Spectral ratios between soft soil and reference rock sites are often used to predict the sedimentary site response to earthquakes. However, their relationship with the genuine site-specific amplification function is often unclear. We compare the soil-to-rock spectral ratios between the stations that are 3.3 km apart with the "genuine" response given by the ratios between the surface and 17 and 47 m downhole. Data from the SMART1 array in Taiwan are used. The "weak" and "strong" motion records are addressed separately to allow for nonlinear soil response. The soil-to-rock spectral ratios are nearly identical to the "true" amplification at the frequencies from 1 to 10 Hz, if the finite depth of the borehole is taken into account. They correctly capture the strong-motion deamplification effect. However, the soil-to-rock spectral ratios are roughly 1.4 times more uncertain than surface-to-47-m ratios. In summary, the soil-to-rock spectral ratios can be considered as the reliable estimates of the real site response.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Site Response in Victoria, British Columbia, from Spectral Ratios and 1D Modeling
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 1109 - 1124.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. A. Beresnev and K.-L. Wen
Nonlinear soil response--A reality?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1964 - 1978.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Seismological Society of America.