HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lin, C.-H. Articles by Roecker, S. W. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

P-wave backazimuth anomalies observed by a small-aperture seismic array at Pinyon Flat, southern California: Implications for structure and source location

Institute of Earth Sciences Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 1-55, NanKang, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180

Abstract

Seismograms of earthquakes and explosions recorded at local, regional, and teleseismic distances by a small-aperture, dense seismic array located on Pinyon Flat, in southern California, reveal large (±15°) backazimuth anomalies. We investigate the causes and implications of these anomalies by first comparing the effectiveness of estimating backazimuth with an array using three different techniques: the broadband frequency-wavenumber (BBFK) technique, the polarization technique, and the beamforming technique. While each technique provided nearly the same direction as a most likely estimate, the beamforming estimate was associated with the smallest uncertainties. Backazimuth anomalies were then calculated for the entire data set by comparing the results from beamforming with backazimuths derived from earthquake locations reported by the Anza and Caltech seismic networks and the Preliminary Determination of Epicenters (PDE) Bulletin. These backazimuth anomalies have a simple sinelike dependence on azimuth, with the largest anomalies observed from the southeast and northwest directions. Such a trend may be explained as the effect of one or more interfaces dipping to the northeast beneath the array. A best-fit model of a single interface has a dip and strike of 20° and 315°, respectively, and a velocity contrast of 0.82 km/sec. Application of corrections computed from this simple model to ray directions significantly improves locations at all distances and directions, suggesting that this is an upper crustal feature. We confirm that knowledge of local structure can be very important for earthquake location by an array but also show that corrections computed from simple models may not only be adequate but superior to those determined by raytracing through smoothed laterally varying models.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Nisii, G. Saccorotti, and S. Nielsen Detailed Analysis of Wave Propagation beneath the Campi Flegrei Caldera, Italy Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 440 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Large Teleseismic P Wavefront Deflections Observed with Broadband Arrays Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2003; 93(2): 747 - 756.

				Slowness Anomalies from Two Dense Seismic Arrays at Deception Island Volcano, Antarctica Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2001; 91(3): 561 - 571.

				L. K. Bear, G. L. Pavlis, and G. H. R. Bokelmann Multi-wavelet analysis of three-component seismic arrays: Application to measure effective anisotropy at Pinon Flats, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1999; 89(3): 693 - 705. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Koch and U. Kradolfer Investigation of azimuth residuals observed at stations of the GSETT-3 Alpha network Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1997; 87(6): 1576 - 1597. [Abstract] [PDF]