Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1996; v. 86; no. 2; p. 363-370
© 1996 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Day, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

RMS response of a one-dimensional half-space to SH

Steven M. Day

Department of Geological Sciences San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182

Abstract

We examine the extent to which the response of a perfectly elastic half-space to an SH-wave incident from below can be characterized when knowledge about the elastic structure is limited to the near surface. Elastic properties are modeled as piecewise continuous functions of the depth coordinate. It is found that the site amplification function can be determined with a frequency resolution that depends inversely on the depth to which the elastic structure is known. Specifically, certain spectral averages of the site amplification function, concentrated over bandwidth {Delta}f, depend only on the elastic structure down to a two-way travel-time depth of 1/{Delta}f. These spectral averages are entirely independent of the elastic properties at greater depth. Equivalently, when the incident motion has a bandlimited white power spectrum of bandwidth {Delta}f, the site amplification of the root mean square (rms) ground motion depends only on the elastic structure down to a two-way travel-time depth of 1/{Delta}f. When the bandwidth is sufficiently large, the following corollary applies: the rms surface ground motion equals the rms incident motion multiplied by 2{surd}Ib/I0, where I0 and Ib are shear impedances at the ground surface and basement depth, respectively. This result provides justification for a procedure conventionally used to correct stochastic estimates of earthquake ground motion to account for local site effects. The analysis also clarifies the limitations of that conventional procedure.

The results define specific site-response parameters that can be computed from knowledge of shallow structure alone and may thereby contribute to improved understanding of the physical basis for, and limitations of, site classification schemes that are based on average S-wave velocity at shallow depth. While the analytical results are rigorous only for infinite Q, numerical experiments indicate that similar results apply to models with finite, frequency-independent Q. The practical utility of the results is likely to be limited primarily by the degree of lateral heterogeneity present near sites of interest and the degree to which the sites respond nonlinearly to incident ground motion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M.-W. Huang, J.-H. Wang, K.-F. Ma, C.-Y. Wang, J.-H. Hung, and K.-L. Wen
Frequency-Dependent Site Amplifications with f >= 0.01 Hz Evaluated from Velocity and Density Models in Central Taiwan
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 624 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Estimation of Q for Long-Period (>2 sec) Waves in the Los Angeles Basin
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2003; 93(2): 627 - 638.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Field and the SCEC Phase III Working Group
Accounting for Site Effects in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California: Overview of the SCEC Phase III Report
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S1 - S31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. Magistrale, S. Day, R. W. Clayton, and R. Graves
The SCEC Southern California Reference Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Model Version 2
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S65 - S76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. G. Anderson and J. N. Brune
Methodology for using precarious rocks in Nevada to test seismic hazard models
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1999; 89(2): 456 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Y. Lee, Y. Zeng, and J. G. Anderson
A simple strategy to examine the sources of errors in attenuation relations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1998; 88(1): 291 - 296.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. M. Boore and W. B. Joyner
Site amplifications for generic rock sites
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1997; 87(2): 327 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. G. Anderson
Seismic energy and stress-drop parameters for a composite source model
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1997; 87(1): 85 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. G. Anderson, Y. Lee, Y. Zeng, and S. Day
Control of strong motion by the upper 30 meters
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1749 - 1759.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Seismological Society of America.