HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shakal, A. F. Articles by Darragh, R. B. Search for Related Content

Interpretation of significant ground-response and structure strong motions recorded during the 1994 Northridge earthquake

California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program Division of Mines and Geology California Department of Conservation, 801 K Street, MS 13-35, Sacramento, CA 95814-3531

Abstract

Some of the largest accelerations and velocities ever recorded at ground-response and structural sites occurred during the Northridge earthquake. These motions are greater than most existing attenuation models would have predicted. Although the motions are large, the correspondence between measured acceleration and damage requires further study, since some sites with high acceleration experienced only moderate damage. Also, some peak vertical accelerations were larger than the horizontal, but in general, they are smaller and fit the pattern observed in previous earthquakes. Strong-motion records processed to date show significant differences in acceleration and velocity waveforms and amplitudes across the San Fernando Valley.

Analysis of processed data from several buildings in the San Fernando Valley indicates that short-period buildings such as shear-wall buildings experienced large forces and relatively low inter-story drift during the Northridge earthquake. However, long-period (1 to 5 sec) steel or concrete moment-frame buildings experienced large inter-story drift. For this earthquake, accelerations did not always amplify from base to roof for flexible structures like the moment-frame buildings, but the displacements were always larger at the roof. The drifts at many of the moment-frame buildings were larger than the drift limit for working stress design in the building code. The records from a base-isolated building indicate that high-frequency motion was reduced significantly by the isolators. The isolators deformed about 3.5 cm, which is much less than the design displacement. The records from a parking structure show important features of the seismic response of this class of structure.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Why 1G Was Recorded at TCU129 Site During the 1999 1Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 91(5): 1255 - 1266.

				TriNet Strong-Motion Data from the M 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake of 16 October 1999 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1525 - 1542.

				Stress Drop, Slip Type, Earthquake Magnitude, and Seismic Hazard Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2001; 91(4): 694 - 707.

				F. Su, J. G. Anderson, and Y. Zeng Study of weak and strong ground motion including nonlinearity from the Northridge, California, earthquake sequence Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1411 - 1425. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. C. Harmsen Determination of site amplification in the Los Angeles urban area from inversion of strong-motion records Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1997; 87(4): 866 - 887. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. A. Beresnev and K.-L. Wen Nonlinear soil response--A reality? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1964 - 1978. [Abstract] [PDF]