Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1996; v. 86; no. 1B; p. S100-S114
© 1996 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Predictability of strong motions from the Northridge, California, earthquake

John G. Anderson and Guang Yu*

Seismological Laboratory and Department of Geological Sciences Mackay School of Mines University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557

Abstract

The composite source model for generating synthetic strong ground motions is tested for its ability to predict the statistical characteristics of Northridge accelerograms recorded in or adjacent to the San Fernando valley. The general problem is prediction of strong motions at a site of engineering interest with sufficient realism to be useful for engineering applications. The strongest test of any proposed method is a blind prediction. For this study, a completely blind test was not possible. Our objective was to use only a preliminary description of fault geometry and magnitude and previously published velocity models and, without iteration to improve the quality of fit, to evaluate the differences between predicted and observed accelerograms.

The parameters that we predict are peak acceleration, peak velocity, peak displacement, Fourier spectra at seven frequencies, and pseudorelative velocity response (5% damping) at seven periods. Our results are given for 14 stations. For the horizontal components, these parameters are all predicted with a maximum bias of under 50% and an average bias of observations exceeding predictions by 6%. For peak acceleration and some response spectral periods, the bias for this model is smaller than at least some regressions, when applied to this specific earthquake. On the vertical component, the maximum bias is a factor of 2, and the average gives predictions exceeding observations by 25%. Standard deviations of the common logarithm of the ratio of observed-to-predicted parameters are typically about 0.3, which is perhaps 50% greater than the standard deviations typical of regressions but comparable to standard deviations of observations from this earthquake compared to regressions. In the future, it is likely that, in some cases, traditional regressions will be replaced with synthetic calculations of some type, such as the method used here. Based on the results of this study, the amount of progress that has been made in obtaining that goal is very encouraging.

Footnotes

* Present address: Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S.-D. Ni, J. G. Anderson, Y. Zeng, and R. V. Siddharthan
Expected Signature of Nonlinearity on Regression for Strong Ground-Motion Parameters
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S53 - S64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Hartzell, S. Harmsen, A. Frankel, and S. Larsen
Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion: Comparison of methods and validation using strong-ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1484 - 1504.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. R. O'Connell
Replication of Apparent Nonlinear Seismic Response with Linear Wave Propagation Models
Science, March 26, 1999; 283(5410): 2045 - 2050.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. Su, J. G. Anderson, and Y. Zeng
Study of weak and strong ground motion including nonlinearity from the Northridge, California, earthquake sequence
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1411 - 1425.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S.-D. Ni, R. V. Siddharthan, and J. G. Anderson
Characteristics of nonlinear response of deep saturated soil deposits
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1997; 87(2): 342 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. G. Anderson
Seismic energy and stress-drop parameters for a composite source model
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1997; 87(1): 85 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. P. Jarpe and P. W. Kasameyer
Validation of a procedure for calculating broadband strong-motion time histories with empirical Green's functions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1996; 86(4): 1116 - 1129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Y. Zeng and J. G. Anderson
A composite source model of the 1994 Northridge earthquake using genetic algorithms
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1996; 86(1B): S71 - S83.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Seismological Society of America.