HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gomberg, J. Articles by Agnew, D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The accuracy of seismic estimates of dynamic strains: An evaluation using strainmeter and seismometer data from Piñon Flat observatory, California

U.S. Geological Survey CERI, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38152
IGPP A-025 University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0225

Abstract

The dynamic strains associated with seismic waves may play a significant role in earthquake triggering, hydrological and magmatic changes, earthquake damage, and ground failure. We determine how accurately dynamic strains may be estimated from seismometer data and elastic-wave theory by comparing such estimated strains with strains measured on a three-component long-base strainmeter system at Piñon Flat, California. We quantify the uncertainties and errors through cross-spectral analysis of data from three regional earthquakes (the M₀ = 4 x 10¹⁷ N-m St. George, Utah; M₀ = 4 x 10¹⁷ N-m Little Skull Mountain, Nevada; and M₀ = 1 x 10¹⁹ N-m Northridge, California, events at distances of 470, 345, and 206 km, respectively). Our analysis indicates that in most cases the phase of the estimated strain matches that of the observed strain quite well (to within the uncertainties, which are about ±0.1 to ±0.2 cycles). However, the amplitudes are often systematically off, at levels exceeding the uncertainties (about 20%); in one case, the predicted strain amplitudes are nearly twice those observed. We also observe significant strains ( = tangential direction), which should be zero theoretically; in the worst case, the rms strain exceeds the other nonzero components. These nonzero strains cannot be caused by deviations of the surface-wave propagation paths from the expected azimuth or by departures from the plane-wave approximation. We believe that distortion of the strain field by topography or material heterogeneities give rise to these complexities.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Lomnitz and C.-j. Zhang Parkfield revisited: I. Data retrieval Lithosphere, August 1, 2009; 1(4): 227 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. H. K. Lee, H. Igel, and M. D. Trifunac Recent Advances in Rotational Seismology Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2009; 80(3): 479 - 490. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. G. Ferreira and H. Igel Rotational Motions of Seismic Surface Waves in a Laterally Heterogeneous Earth Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1429 - 1436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Langston Spatial Gradient Analysis for Linear Seismic Arrays Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2007; 97(1B): 265 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. McLeod, G. E. Stedman, T. H. Webb, and U. Schreiber Comparison of standard and ring laser rotational seismograms Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1495 - 1503. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Lomnitz Frequency response of a strainmeter Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1997; 87(4): 1078 - 1080. [Abstract] [PDF]