HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jones, L. E. Articles by Hough, S. E. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Analysis of broadband records from the 28 June 1992 Big Bear earthquake: Evidence of a multiple-event source

Seismological Laboratory California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
U.S. Geological Survey, Pasadena, California 91006

Abstract

The 28 June 1992 Big Bear earthquake occurred at 15:05:21 GMT and is considered to be an aftershock of the earlier M_w = 7.3 Landers earthquake. From overall aftershock locations and long-period focal studies, rupture is generally assumed to have propagated northeast. No surface rupture was found, however, and the mainshock locations determined from both strong motion and TERRAscope data are mutually consistent and do not lie on the assumed fault plane. Further, directivity analysis of records from the TERRAscope array suggests significant short- and long-period energy propagating northwest along the presumed antithetic fault plane. This observation is supported by significant early aftershocks distributed along both the presumed rupture plane and the antithetic plane to the northwest. An empirical Green's function (eGf) approach using both the M_w = 5.2, 28 June 1992 14:43 GMT foreshock and the M_w = 5.0 17 August 1992 aftershock produces consistent results and suggests that the Big Bear event comprised at least two substantial subevents. From the eGf results, we infer that the second and possibly a third subevent occurred on the presumed (northeast striking) mainshock rupture surface, but that significant moment release occurred on the antithetic northwest striking surface. We present results from line-source fault modeling of broadband displacement recordings of the Big Bear mainshock, which indicate that a two-fault event is necessary to produce the observed waveforms. The limitations imposed by the mainshock location and directivity analysis require that the initial rupture be towards the northwest, striking 320°. This was followed approximately 4 sec later by bilateral rupture along a northeast-southwest fault that strikes 50° east of north.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. Mellors, H. Magistrale, P. Earle, and A. Cogbill Comparison of Four Moderate-Size Earthquakes in Southern California Using Seismology and InSAR Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6): 2004 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				The Seismogenic Thickness of the Southern California Crust Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 940 - 960.

				Transient Stress-Coupling Between the 1992 Landers and 1999 Hector Mine, California, Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1470 - 1486.

				Empirical Green's Function Analysis of Recent Moderate Events in California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2001; 91(3): 456 - 467.

				L. E. Jones and D. V. Helmberger Earthquake source parameters and fault kinematics in the eastern California shear zone Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1337 - 1352. [Abstract] [PDF]