Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1995; v. 85; no. 2; p. 496-515
© 1995 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beresnev, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tein Yeh, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Nonlinear soil amplification: Its corroboration in Taiwan

Igor A. Beresnev, Kuo-Liang Wen and Yeong Tein Yeh

Institute of Earth Sciences Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 1-55, Nankang, Taipei 11529 Taiwan

Abstract

Nonlinear ground response at two strong-motion arrays in Taiwan is studied using the spectral ratio technique. At the SMART1 array, we calculate the frequency-dependent soil amplification functions as a ratio of the spectra at alluvium to rock sites, and study their dependence on the excitation level. Horizontal components of shear waves are considered. We compare (1) the average spectral ratios on weak and strong motions, (2) the ratios for the mainshocks and aftershocks, and (3) the ratios for the strong shear waves and their coda. At the SMART1 array, "weak motions" have a peak horizontal acceleration (PHA) less than 30 Gal. "Strong motions" are in the range of 100 to 267 Gal. Comparison of the average weak- and strong-motion spectral ratios shows a significant deamplification of strong motion between 2 and 9 Hz, exceeding the error margin estimated by the standard deviations. The maximum deamplification occurs at approximately 6.5 Hz where the average weak-motion amplification is 2.9 versus 0.40 in the strong motion. A similar pattern is exhibited by the ratios calculated for the mainshocks and the aftershocks, as well as for the shear waves and their coda. The spectral ratio calculated from a single realization of coda is identical to the average ratio obtained from many small earthquakes. At the SMART2, we analyze spectral ratios between the stations on Pleistocene terrace deposits and recent alluvium, which characterize the relative response at these two types of sediments. Weak motion is PHA less than 13 Gal, while strong motion extends from 100 to 295 Gal. Strong-motion spectral ratios between terrace and alluvial sites are consistently reduced in the frequency range from ~1 to 10 Hz, compared with the weak motion. This effect is insensitive to the variation in distance between stations from 7.9 to 11.4 km, as well as the azimuthal change of up to 80° in the station pair strike. We attribute the observed discrepancies between weak- and strong-motion amplifications to the differential nonlinear response occurring at terrace and alluvial sites. Our results document a significant nonlinear ground response at both arrays.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
O. V. Pavlenko and K. Irikura
Nonlinear Behavior of Soils Revealed from the Records of the 2000 Tottori, Japan, Earthquake at Stations of the Digital Strong-Motion Network Kik-Net
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2131 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. F. Bonilla, R. J. Archuleta, and D. Lavallee
Hysteretic and Dilatant Behavior of Cohesionless Soils and Their Effects on Nonlinear Site Response: Field Data Observations and Modeling
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2373 - 2395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Dilatancy-Induced P Waves as Evidence for Nonlinear Soil Behavior
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 854 - 862.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Nonlinear Seismic Effects in Soils: Numerical Simulation and Study
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2001; 91(2): 381 - 396.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. P. Dimitriu, Ch. A. Papaioannou, and N. P. Theodulidis
EURO-SEISTEST strong-motion array near Thessaloniki, Northern Greece: A study of site effects
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1998; 88(3): 862 - 873.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. Aguirre and K. Irikura
Nonlinearity, liquefaction, and velocity variation of soft soil layers in Port Island, Kobe, during the Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1997; 87(5): 1244 - 1258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. C. Harmsen
Determination of site amplification in the Los Angeles urban area from inversion of strong-motion records
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1997; 87(4): 866 - 887.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. A. Beresnev and K.-L. Wen
Nonlinear soil response--A reality?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1964 - 1978.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. A. Beresnev and K.-L. Wen
The possiblity of observing nonlinear path effect in earthquake-induced seismic wave propagation
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1996; 86(4): 1028 - 1041.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. A. Beresnev and K.-L. Wen
P-wave amplification by near-surface deposits at different excitation levels
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1995; 85(5): 1490 - 1494.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Seismological Society of America.