HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yu, G. Articles by Zeng, Y. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Strong ground motion from the Uttarkashi, Himalaya, India, earthquake: Comparison of observations with synthetics using the composite source model

Seismological Laboratory and Department of Geological Sciences Mackay School of Mines University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, Nevada 89557
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun U. P. 248001 India

Abstract

The Uttarkashi earthquake of 19 October 1991 (M_S = 7.0) occurred in the greater Himalayan region north of the main central thrust, at an estimated depth of 12 km. The fault plane solution indicates a low-angle thrust mechanism, striking northwest, consistent with the tectonic pattern of thrusting in the region. Aftershocks define a belt parallel to, and north of, the surface trace of the main central thrust, roughly 10-km wide and 30-km long. The mainshock is located at the northeast edge of this zone. The earthquake was recorded on 13 strong-motion accelerographs at distances ranging from 25 to 150 km from the epicenter. One station at Bhatwari (peak horizontal acceleration of 272 cm sec^–2) is above the aftershock zone. The maximum peak horizontal acceleration was about 313 cm sec^–2 at Uttarkashi, at an epicentral distance of 36 km.

The amplitudes and frequency content of the strong ground motions are more or less consistent with expectations for an earthquake of this magnitude in California. Synthetics generated using the composite source model and synthetic Green's functions (Zeng et al., 1994a, b) are successful in producing acceleration, velocity, and displacement with a realistic appearance and the correct statistical properties of the two accelerograms recorded nearest the fault (Bhatwari and Uttarkashi). To produce these, we introduced trial-and-error modifications of the layered-medium velocity model within uncertainties. At more distant stations, we first used the velocity structure that worked for the two nearest stations. Differences emphasize the large potential role of unknown site and wave-propagation effects. For the station at Tehri, we explored different velocity models, and found one there that was also quite successful. We then used these two velocity models to predict strong ground motions at Bhatwari and Tehri, from a potential magnitude 8.5 earthquake filling part of the seismic gap along the Himalayan frontal faults. The synthetics show peak accelerations that are only somewhat larger than those in the Uttarkashi event, but much longer durations and increased amplitudes of response spectra at long periods.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Assatourians and G. M. Atkinson Modeling Variable-Stress Distribution with the Stochastic Finite-Fault Technique Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 1935 - 1949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Joshi Use of Acceleration Spectra for Determining the Frequency-Dependent Attenuation Coefficient and Source Parameters Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2165 - 2180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q of the Indian Shield Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2004; 94(4): 1564 - 1570.

				Estimation of Ground Motion for Bhuj (26 January 2001; Mw 7.6) and for Future Earthquakes in India Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 353 - 370.

				Ground Motion in Delhi from Future Large/Great Earthquakes in the Central Seismic Gap of the Himalayan Arc Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 555 - 569.

				D. R. O'Connell Replication of Apparent Nonlinear Seismic Response with Linear Wave Propagation Models Science, March 26, 1999; 283(5410): 2045 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				F. Su, J. G. Anderson, and Y. Zeng Study of weak and strong ground motion including nonlinearity from the Northridge, California, earthquake sequence Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1411 - 1425. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. A. Beresnev and G. M. Atkinson Modeling finite-fault radiation from the {omega}n spectrum Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1997; 87(1): 67 - 84. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. G. Anderson Seismic energy and stress-drop parameters for a composite source model Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1997; 87(1): 85 - 96. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Zeng and J. G. Anderson A composite source model of the 1994 Northridge earthquake using genetic algorithms Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1996; 86(1B): S71 - S83. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. G. Anderson and G. Yu Predictability of strong motions from the Northridge, California, earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1996; 86(1B): S100 - S114. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. G. Anderson and Q. Chen Beginnings of earthquakes in the Mexican subduction zone on strong-motion accelerograms Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1995; 85(4): 1107 - 1115. [Abstract] [PDF]