Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1994; v. 84; no. 5; p. 1593-1607
© 1994 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Carter, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Variations in noise and signal levels in a pair of deep boreholes near Amarillo, Texas

Christopher J. Young, Eric P. Chael, David A. Zagar and Jerry A. Carter

Division 6116 Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-5800
Division 9232 Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-5800
Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, Virginia 22209

Abstract

To better understand the depth dependence of improvements in signal-to-noise ratio for borehole seismic data, we have collected and analyzed a data set recorded from a pair of high-fidelity, broadband (1 to 80 Hz) seismometers sited in two closely separated deep boreholes near Amarillo, Texas. The total decrease (surface to 1951 m) in minimum noise level is up to 30 dB; the total decrease in maximum noise level is up to 35 dB; and the range of noise values (maximum to minimum) at a given depth decreases from 30 to 10 dB. The majority of the noise reduction occurs within the first few hundred meters below the surface, but the decrease continues with depth and there is no indication that even lower noise levels do not exist below our deepest recording depth (1951 m). Cultural work-day noise (prominent during normal working hours) from 0 to 40 Hz is observed at all depths, suggesting a strong body-wave component. Wind-generated 15 to 60-Hz noise is strongest at the surface, and is observed as deep as 367 m without a properly shielded hole. With the addition of shielding to reduce the coupling between the borehole casing and/or cable with the wind, wind-generated noise above 40 Hz can be eliminated at 367 m. Events with near-vertical propagation paths and signal power above 1 Hz show signal strength decreasing uphole, with a steady winnowing of high frequencies that can be fit by a simple frequency-independent Q of 35.5 ± 8 for the material between 1951 and 367 m.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. M. Withers, R. C. Aster, C. J. Young, and E. P. Chael
High-frequency analysis of seismic background noise as a function of wind speed and shallow depth
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1996; 86(5): 1507 - 1515.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. J. Young, E. P. Chael, M. M. Withers, and R. C. Aster
A comparison of the high-frequency (>1 Hz) surface and subsurface noise environment at three sites in the United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1996; 86(5): 1516 - 1528.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Seismological Society of America.