HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Abe, K. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Instrumental magnitudes of historical earthquakes, 1892 to 1898

Earthquake Research Institute The University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113, Japan

Abstract

In the 1890s of the dawn of instrumental seismology, a variety of primitive but sophisticated seismographs were erected in Europe. The quality varies greatly from instrument to instrument. In use of those records, the instrument magnification needs to be calibrated with extreme caution, because of the lack of damping. From comparison of the trace amplitudes measured by such instruments with those by reliable instruments, the effective gain for surface-wave maxima of distant shocks is determined here for each of the vertical or horizontal pendulums that were operated at Catania, Rocca di Papa, Ischia, Roma, Padua, Nicolajew, Charkow, Strassburg, and Shide. The effective gain is found to be greatly different from the static magnification. The period of surface-wave maxima is on average 17 sec. The results are applied to reported amplitudes for determining the surface-wave magnitude of 53 major earthquakes recorded from 1892 to 1898. The magnitude of the destructive tsunami earthquake that occurred off northeastern Honshu, Japan, on 15 June 1896 is determined to be 7.2. The great Assam, India earthquake of 12 June 1897 has a magnitude of 8.0. The present study demonstrates that despite various difficulties, historical records, if properly interpreted, provide invaluable information.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Earthquakes and Associated Deformation in Northern Baluchistan 1892-2001 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1573 - 1605.

				Reevaluated Intensities for the Great Assam Earthquake of 12 June 1897, Shillong, India Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2003; 93(2): 655 - 673.

				S. P. Satyabala and H. K. Gupta Is the quiescence of major earthquakes (M greater double equals 7.5) Since 1952 in the Himalaya and northeast India real? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1983 - 1986. [Abstract] [PDF]