Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1994; v. 84; no. 2; p. 366-376
© 1994 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Earle, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Shearer, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Characterization of global seismograms using an automatic-picking algorithm

Paul S. Earle and Peter M. Shearer

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics Scripps Institution of Oceanography U.C. San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0225

Abstract

An automatic phase picker is useful for quickly identifying and timing phase arrivals in large seismic data bases. We have developed an automatic phase picker that is sensitive to small changes in amplitude and applied it to over 7 yr of global data distributed by the National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC). Our phase-picking algorithm is based on a short-term-average to long-term-average ratio (STA/LTA) taken along an envelope function generated from the seismogram. The algorithm returns arrival times and corresponding pick qualities. The procedure requires few input parameters and is easily adapted to various types of data. We produce global travel-time plots from both high-frequency (20- or 40-Hz sample rate) and low-frequency (1-Hz sample rate) data. These plots clearly image the predominant high- and low-frequency phases in the NEIC data base. Picks made from the long-period seismograms are less precise, but they reveal far more phase arrivals than the short-period picks. A number of phases resulting from reflections and phase conversions at upper mantle discontinuities can be identified in the low-frequency picks; however, a search of the short-period picks for upper mantle discontinuity phases, between P and PP and prior to P'P', has so far been unsuccessful. In the long-period S and SS picks, we observe a discrepancy in SV and SH travel times, a possible result of upper mantle anisotropy. To check the accuracy and consistency of our algorithm, we present comparisons between hand-picked times and automatic-picked times for identical seismograms. Travel-time residuals from the short-period automatic picks and data reported to the International Seismological Centre (ISC) picks exhibit a comparable amount of scatter. Histograms of the ISC residuals and automatic-pick residuals are similar in shape and width for P and PcP. These observations suggest that human picking errors are not a major contributor to the scatter observed in ISC travel times, although direct comparisons between ISC reported picks and automatic picks on particular seismograms occasionally identify operator mispicks.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. W. Hildyard, S. E. J. Nippress, and A. Rietbrock
Event Detection and Phase Picking Using a Time-Domain Estimate of Predominate Period Tpd
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2008; 98(6): 3025 - 3032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Automatic P-Wave Arrival Detection and Picking with Multiscale Wavelet Analysis for Single-Component Recordings
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2003; 93(5): 1904 - 1912.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Distribution of Fine-Scale Mantle Heterogeneity from Observations of Pdiff Coda
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1875 - 1881.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Comparison of Manual and Automatic Onset Time Picking
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6): 1384 - 1390.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Automatic Phase-Detection and Identification by Full Use of a Single Three-Component Broadband Seismogram
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2000; 90(1): 187 - 198.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. Withers, R. Aster, C. Young, J. Beiriger, M. Harris, S. Moore, and J. Trujillo
A comparison of select trigger algorithms for automated global seismic phase and event detection
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1998; 88(1): 95 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. S. Anant and F. U. Dowla
Wavelet transform methods for phase identification in three-component seismograms
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1997; 87(6): 1598 - 1612.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. Tong and B. L. N. Kennett
Automatic seismic event recognition and later phase identification for broadband seismograms
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1896 - 1909.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Seismological Society of America.