|
|
||||||||
DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY QUEENS COLLEGE, FLUSHING, NY 11367
GRADUATE SCHOOL AND UNIVERSITY CENTER CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, NY 10036
Abstract
Earthquake frequency-magnitude relationships can be well described as a polymodal composite of normal distributions, a pattern consistent with varying causal mechanisms in different tectonic settings and/or magnitude ranges but a pattern also in conflict with the assumption of self-similarity or the fractal nature of earthquakes. From the Giardini Catalog, 4660 deep (> 350 km) worldwide earthquakes presumably homogeneous with respect to causal mechanism, are well described as a single normally distributed population. Analysis of 10,341 earthquakes ranging in magnitude from 2.0 to 8.2 from the 1989 to 1991 National Earthquake Information Center - Quick Epicenter Determination catalogue yields three populations each of whose magnitude frequency is expressed in terms of probability. Some nonsimilar frequency-magnitude distributions for low magnitudes are also explicable as the result of one or more normally distributed populations. In our model, b is a measure of the dispersion of the population.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Amorese Applying a Change-Point Detection Method on Frequency-Magnitude Distributions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1742 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sun and T.-C. Pan The probability of very large earthquakes in Sumatra Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1995; 85(4): 1226 - 1231. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |