HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BOLLINGER, G. A. Articles by SIBOL, M. S. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A comparison of earthquake damage areas as a function of magnitude across the United States

SEISMOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY, BLACKSBURG, VA 24061-0420

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between earthquake magnitude and the size of damage areas in the eastern and western United States. To quantify damage area as a function of moment magnitude (M), 149 MMI VI and VII areas for 109 earthquakes (88 in the western United States, 21 in the eastern United States and Canada) were measured. Regression of isoseismal areas versus M indicated that areas in the East were larger than those in the West, at both intensity levels, by an average 5 x in the M 4.5 to 7.5 range. In terms of radii for circles of equivalent area, these results indicate that damaging ground motion from shocks of the same magnitude extend 2 x the epicentral distance in eastern North America compared to the West.

To determine source and site parameters consistent with the above results, response spectral levels for eastern North America were stochastically simulated and compared with response spectral ordinates derived from recorded strong ground motion data in the western United States. Stress-drop values of 200 bars, combined with a surficial 2-km-thick low velocity "sedimentary" layer over rock basement, produced results that are compatible with the intensity observations, i.e., similar response spectral levels in the east at approximately twice their epicentral distance in the western U.S. distance.

These results suggest that ground motion modeling in eastern North America may need to incorporate source and site parameters different from those presently in general use. The results are also of importance to eastern U.S. hazard assessments as they require allowance for the larger damage areas in preparedness and mitigation programs.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. W. Campbell Comment on "Empirical-Stochastic Ground-Motion Prediction for Eastern North America" by Behrooz Tavakoli and Shahram Pezeshk Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 2094 - 2097. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Earthquake Source Parameters and State of Stress for the Northeastern United States and Southeastern Canada from Analysis of Regional Seismograms Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1633 - 1648.

				K. W. Campbell Prediction of Strong Ground Motion Using the Hybrid Empirical Method and Its Use in the Development of Ground-Motion (Attenuation) Relations in Eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1012 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Attenuation of Intensity with Epicentral Distance in the Iberian Peninsula Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2000; 90(1): 34 - 47.

				G. M. Atkinson and D. M. Boore Evaluation of models for earthquake source spectra in eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1998; 88(4): 917 - 934. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Suter, M. Carrillo-Martinez, and O. Quintero-Legorreta Macroseismic study of shallow earthquakes in the central and eastern parts of the trans-Mexican volcanic belt, Mexico Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1952 - 1963. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. M. Atkinson and T. C. Hanks A high-frequency magnitude scale Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1995; 85(3): 825 - 833. [Abstract] [PDF]