Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1993; v. 83; no. 2; p. 347-357
© 1993 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FENOGLIO, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSTON, M. J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Comparison of ultra-low frequency electromagnetic signals with aftershock activity during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake sequence

M. A. FENOGLIO, A. C. FRASER-SMITH, G. C. BEROZA and M. J. S. JOHNSTONb

DEPARTMENT OF GEOPHYSICS STANFORD UNIVERSITY, STANFORD, CALIFORNIA 94305
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, MS977, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025
STAR LABORATORY STANFORD UNIVERSITY, STANFORD, CALIFORNIA 94305

Abstract

Ultra-low frequency (0.01 to 10.0 Hz) magnetic field fluctuations near the epicenter of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake rose sharply immediately before the earthquake following indications of increased disturbance during the previous 12 days. The magnetic activity remained much higher than the pre-earthquake background level for 6 weeks following the mainshock. These observations suggest a causal relationship between the earthquake failure process and the magnetic signals. A search for similar precursory electromagnetic signals associated with aftershocks of this earthquake yields negative results. Specifically, no correlation appears to exist between the amplitude of the electromagnetic activity and the frequency or magnitude of aftershocks following the mainshock. Either a "threshold" earthquake magnitude larger, in this case, than ML 5.5, may be necessary to generate precursory electromagnetic signals or the continued generation of magnetic signals related to the mainshock may have masked signals generated by the larger aftershocks.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Analysis of Ultralow-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Measurements Associated with the 1999 M 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake Sequence
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1513 - 1524.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Seismological Society of America.