Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1993; v. 83; no. 1; p. 1-6
© 1993 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SAVAGE, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Parkfield prediction fallacy

J. C. SAVAGE

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, MS 977, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025-3591

Abstract

The Parkfield earthquake prediction is generally stated as a 95% probability that the next moderate earthquake there should occur before January 1993. That time limit is based on a two-sided 95% confidence interval. Because at the time of the prediction (1985) it was already clear that the earthquake had not occurred prior to 1985, a one-sided 95% confidence interval would have been more appropriate. That confidence interval ended in October 1991. The Parkfield prediction was based on an extrapolation of five of the six events in the 1857 to 1966 earthquake sequence; the 1934 event was omitted because it did not fit the regularity exhibited by the other data. The fallacy in the prediction is that it did not take account of other less-contrived explanations of the Parkfield seismicity (e.g., not excluding the 1934 event). Even if the Parkfield earthquake should occur in the near future, it would be better explained by less-contrived hypotheses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. R. Sykes and W. Menke
Repeat Times of Large Earthquakes: Implications for Earthquake Mechanics and Long-Term Prediction
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1569 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. J. Lienkaemper, B. Baker, and F. S. McFarland
Surface Slip Associated with the 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake Measured on Alinement Arrays
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S239 - S249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. D. Jackson and Y. Y. Kagan
The 2004 Parkfield Earthquake, the 1985 Prediction, and Characteristic Earthquakes: Lessons for the Future
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S397 - S409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
1857 Slip on the San Andreas Fault Southeast of Cholame, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1659 - 1672.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Seismological Society of America.