|
|
||||||||
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, MS 977, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025-3591
Abstract
The Parkfield earthquake prediction is generally stated as a 95% probability that the next moderate earthquake there should occur before January 1993. That time limit is based on a two-sided 95% confidence interval. Because at the time of the prediction (1985) it was already clear that the earthquake had not occurred prior to 1985, a one-sided 95% confidence interval would have been more appropriate. That confidence interval ended in October 1991. The Parkfield prediction was based on an extrapolation of five of the six events in the 1857 to 1966 earthquake sequence; the 1934 event was omitted because it did not fit the regularity exhibited by the other data. The fallacy in the prediction is that it did not take account of other less-contrived explanations of the Parkfield seismicity (e.g., not excluding the 1934 event). Even if the Parkfield earthquake should occur in the near future, it would be better explained by less-contrived hypotheses.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. R. Sykes and W. Menke Repeat Times of Large Earthquakes: Implications for Earthquake Mechanics and Long-Term Prediction Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1569 - 1596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Lienkaemper, B. Baker, and F. S. McFarland Surface Slip Associated with the 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake Measured on Alinement Arrays Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S239 - S249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Jackson and Y. Y. Kagan The 2004 Parkfield Earthquake, the 1985 Prediction, and Characteristic Earthquakes: Lessons for the Future Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S397 - S409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
1857 Slip on the San Andreas Fault Southeast of Cholame, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1659 - 1672. |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |