Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1992; v. 82; no. 6; p. 2283-2307
© 1992 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FIELD, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by HOUGH, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Earthquake site response estimation: A weak-motion case study

E. H. FIELD, K. H. JACOB and S. E. HOUGH

LAMONT-DOHERTY GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, PALISADES, NEW YORK 10964

Abstract

Using weak-motion recordings of aftershocks of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake recorded in Oakland, California, near the failed Nimitz Freeway, two methods have been applied to estimate the site response of an alluvium site and three mud-over-alluvium sites. The first estimate is the traditional spectral ratio, and the second utilizes the cross spectrum. Recordings obtained at a nearby bedrock site are used as estimates of the sediment site input motions. While the two site response estimates produce similar peaks and troughs, there is an approximate factor of 2 difference in amplitudes. This discrepancy is evidence that there is a much greater level of noise than would be expected from the pre-event ambient noise. We interpret this as signal-generated noise produced by scattering from heterogeneities, which causes the true sediment site input to differ significantly from the bedrock site recording. Given this level of noise, the cross-spectrum estimate suffers a severe downward bias (by a factor of 2 in this study) and should probably not be used when the input motion is estimated from a bedrock site recording. The spectral-ratio estimates are relatively unbiased, but the level of noise introduces a large degree of uncertainty. Therefore, inferences about site response from individual spectral ratios should probably be avoided. On the other hand, ensemble averages of the estimates significantly reduce the scatter to reveal resonances that agree quite well in frequency and overall shape with those of one-dimensional models whose parameters were determined independently. A discrepancy of higher observed amplitudes than predicted by theory remains unexplained but most likely results from the effects of boundary layer topography, which are not accounted for by the simple one-dimensional models.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. De Luca, S. Marcucci, G. Milana, and T. Sano
Evidence of Low-Frequency Amplification in the City of L'Aquila, Central Italy, through a Multidisciplinary Approach Including Strong- and Weak-Motion Data, Ambient Noise, and Numerical Modeling
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1469 - 1481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Estimated Ground Motion From the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake at the Site of the Interstate 10 and La Cienega Boulevard Bridge Collapse, West Los Angeles, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2003; 93(6): 2737 - 2751.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Site Response, Shallow Shear-Wave Velocity, and Wave Propagation at the San Jose, California, Dense Seismic Array
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 443 - 464.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Determination of S-Wave Site Response in the Garhwal Himalaya from the Aftershock Sequence of the 1999 Chamoli Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 1072 - 1081.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. A. Wald and J. Mori
Evaluation of Methods for Estimating Linear Site-Response Amplifications in the Los Angeles Region
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S32 - S42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. F. Bonilla, J. H. Steidl, G. T. Lindley, A. G. Tumarkin, and R. J. Archuleta
Site amplification in the San Fernando Valley, California: Variability of site-effect estimation using the S-wave, coda, and H/V methods
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1997; 87(3): 710 - 730.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. E. Abercrombie
Near-surface attenuation and site effects from comparison of surface and deep borehole recordings
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1997; 87(3): 731 - 744.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. H. Steidl, A. G. Tumarkin, and R. J. Archuleta
What is a reference site?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1733 - 1748.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. J. Al-Shukri, G. L. Pavlis, and F. L. Vernon III
Site effect observations from broadband arrays
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1995; 85(6): 1758 - 1769.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. M. Fischer, L. A. Salvati, S. E. Hough, E. Gonzalez, C. E. Nelsen, and E. G. Roth
Sediment-induced amplification in the Northeastern United States: A case study in Providence, Rhode Island
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1995; 85(5): 1388 - 1397.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Field and K. H. Jacob
A comparison and test of various site-response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference-site dependent
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1995; 85(4): 1127 - 1143.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. H. Cramer
Weak-motion observations and modeling for the Turkey Flat, U.S., Site-Effects Test Area near Parkfield, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1995; 85(2): 440 - 451.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. Gagnepain-Beyneix, J. C. Lepine, A. Nercessian, and A. Hirn
Experimental study of site effects in the Fort-de-France area (Martinique island)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1995; 85(2): 478 - 495.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Field, A. C. Clement, K. H. Jacob, V. Aharonian, S. E. Hough, P. A. Friberg, T. O. Babaian, S. S. Karapetian, S. M. Hovanessian, and H. A. Abramian
Earthquake site-response study in Giumri (formerly Leninakan), Armenia, using ambient noise observations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1995; 85(1): 349 - 353.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. Frankel
Dense array recordings in the San Bernardino Valley of landers-big bear aftershocks: Basin surface waves, Moho reflections, and three-dimensional simulations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1994; 84(3): 613 - 624.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. MALAGNINI, A. ROVELLI, S. E. HOUGH, and L. SEEBER
Site amplification estimates in the Garigliano valley, central Italy, based on dense array measurements of ambient noise
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1993; 83(6): 1744 - 1755.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Seismological Society of America.