Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1992; v. 82; no. 5; p. 2224-2247
© 1992 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COLBURN, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by HAWMAN, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Inversion of slant stacks of deep crustal refraction data from the Great Valley, California

ROBERT H. COLBURN* and ROBERT B. HAWMAN{dagger}

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS PROGRAM FOR CRUSTAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING, LARAMIE, WYOMING 82071

Abstract

Analysis in the {tau}(p) domain of a refraction profile recorded in the Great Valley of California provides a check on models derived by raytracing. Coherency filtering based on a method developed for marine data has proved effective in suppressing aliasing in slant stacks of source gathers with receiver spacings greater than 800 m. Depth bounds derived by extremal inversion of {tau}(p) data for two reversed shots range from 2 to 8 km in width and are consistent with two-dimensional models derived by trial-and-error using T(X) data. Both methods produce models with features such as a prominent discontinuity at the base of the sediments and a steep velocity gradient in the mid-crust, demonstrating that the major phases used to derive the two-dimensional models have also been imaged successfully in the {tau}(p) domain. Differences between {tau}(p) arrivals picked for the reversed shots are also consistent with differences predicted by the earlier models. Events interpreted as precritical reflections from the Moho have proved useful in constraining total crustal thickness (25 to 29 km). Average crustal velocities for slowness-depth models corresponding to extremal depths range from 5.2 to 5.5 km/sec (if sediments with velocities less than 5.0 km/sec are not included: 6.5 to 6.7 km/sec). Velocities at the base of the crust fall between 7.1 and 7.4 km/sec, while predicted critical distances for the Moho reflection range from 63 to 71 km. Predicted normal two-way travel times to the Moho lie between 9.8 and 10.2 sec, in agreement with Moho reflections identified on nearby reflection profiles. In the lower half of the crust, layers with velocities greater than 6.7 km/sec are interpreted as mafic rock. We suggest that a roughly 4-km-thick layer with velocities around 6.1 km/sec consists of metamorphosed graywacke rather than granite, as had been suggested by previous workers. This would be more consistent with models that interpret the crust beneath the Coast Ranges and western half of the Great Valley to be a complex of marine clastics and basement obducted onto the North American continent during the late Mesozoic.

Footnotes

* Present address: CogniSeis Development, 2401 Portsmouth, Houston, Texas 77098.

{dagger} Present address: Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. G. Hennet, R. B. Hawman, and R. A. Phinney
Slant stacks of refraction data from maine: Effects of lateral variations in velocity structure
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1995; 85(6): 1541 - 1559.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Seismological Society of America.