Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1992; v. 82; no. 3; p. 1416-1433
© 1992 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RICHARDS, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by SIMPSON, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A survey of blasting activity in the United States

PAUL G. RICHARDS, DOUGLAS A. ANDERSON and DAVID W. SIMPSON

LAMONT-DOHERTY GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY, PALISADES, NEW YORK 10964
VIBRA-TECH ENGINEERS, INC., P.O. BOX 577, HAZELTON, PENNSYLVANIA 18201-0577

Abstract

Statistical information on chemical explosions is needed in seismology, to evaluate the practical difficulties in identifying this very common type of seismic source from other seismic sources such as small earthquakes and small nuclear explosions.

We have obtained data on blasting activity from three different sources: (1) overview information from the U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM) on the total amount of chemical explosives used in the United States during 1987, with breakdowns into different explosive types, and usage by different states; (2) overview information from the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) on the numbers of mines, of different types, in the United States; and (3) detailed information from a private company (Vibra-Tech Engineers, Inc.) on total shot size and size of charge per delay for 20,813 blasts carried out in 1987 at 532 locations.

Our procedure has been to extrapolate the detailed information contained in the 1987 Vibra-Tech data for a limited number of states and thus to obtain estimates for the whole country on numbers of shots and their size distribution. The extrapolation is constrained by the data from USBM (numbers of shots, sizes) and the MSHA (locations). Blasting activity does not fluctuate greatly from year to year and 1987 was representative of current practice.

We find that about 2.2 million metric tons of chemical explosive are used annually in the continental U.S., principally in mining for coal and metal ores. On a typical work day, there are roughly 30 explosions greater than 50 tons, including about one greater than 200 tons. There was one industrial explosion in 1987 at about 1400 tons. For shots between 1 ton and 100 tons, the cumulative distribution has a b-value near unity; that is, if N is the number of shots (per year) greater than or equal to W tons,


Formula

with b roughly equal to 1. This result is similar to the size distribution of earthquakes greater than magnitude mb,


Formula

Almost all chemical explosions above 1 ton are ripple-fired. The typical shot uses 20 to 50 separate delays.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. Hooper, J. Bonner, and M. Leidig
Effects of Confinement on Short-Period Surface Waves: Observations from a New Dataset
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 697 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Azimuthal Variation of Short-Period Rayleigh Waves from Cast Blasts in Northern Arizona
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2003; 93(2): 724 - 736.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. L. Nowack and W.-P. Chen
Source-receiver reciprocity and empirical Green's functions from chemical blasts
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1999; 89(2): 538 - 543.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
V. I. Khalturin, T. G. Rautian, and P. G. Richards
The seismic signal strength of chemical explosions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1511 - 1524.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. A. H. Hedlin
A global test of a time-frequency small-event discriminant
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1998; 88(4): 973 - 988.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. Y. Kim, D. W. Simpson, and P. G. Richards
High-frequency spectra of regional phases from earthquakes and chemical explosions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1994; 84(5): 1365 - 1386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. R. Taylor
False alarms and mine seismicity: An example from the Gentry Mountain Mining Region, Utah
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1994; 84(2): 350 - 358.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
G. E. van der Vink, G. E. van der Vink, and J. Park
Nuclear Test Ban Monitoring: New Requirements, New Resources
Science, February 4, 1994; 263(5147): 634 - 635.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Seismological Society of America.