| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES INDIANA UNIVERSITY, BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA 47405
Abstract
Earthquake location estimates suffer from two types of errors: (1) systematic offsets caused by large scale earth structure, and (2) scatter of locations of different earthquakes relative to each other. I show that relative location errors are controlled by four separate error terms: (1) scatter caused by random, measurement error; (2) nonlinear effects; (3) mislocations caused by interaction of errors in modeling travel times with variations in the number and quality of arrivals recorded by different events; and (4) mislocations caused by variations in how errors in modeling travel times vary with position inside the real Earth. The first can be handled by conventional statistical methods. The second can be bounded using a second-order approximation, provided one can provide a reasonable estimate for an upper bound on the total spatial error that might be present in the location estimate. I demonstrate that the size of each of the two error terms related to inadequate knowledge of the Earth's velocity structure can be bounded provided we can determine an upper bound on travel-time errors as a function of distance. I describe an empirical approach for determining such a bound using differences between the sum of squared residuals of earthquakes located with all available data and the same event located with a single arrival deleted. This calculation is repeated for all arrivals and used to construct an upper bound on travel-time errors as a function of distance. The concepts developed are applied to bound errors in locations of earthquakes in the Garm region of central Asia, and they demonstrate the utility of these ideas in sorting out events with minimal relative error.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Zeiler and A. A. Velasco Seismogram Picking Error from Analyst Review (SPEAR): Single-Analyst and Institution Analysis Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 2759 - 2770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Mellors, H. Magistrale, P. Earle, and A. Cogbill Comparison of Four Moderate-Size Earthquakes in Southern California Using Seismology and InSAR Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6): 2004 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluating the Fit of Alternative Hypocenters to Arrival Times Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 519 - 525.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the Mathematics of Using Difference Operators to Relocate Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 2879 - 2892.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and Testing of a 3D Velocity Model for Improved Event Location: A Case Study for the India-Pakistan Region Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 2893 - 2910.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improving Regional Earthquake Locations Using a Modified G Matrix and Fuzzy Logic Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2001; 91(1): 82 - 93.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm: Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6): 1353 - 1368.
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Zheng, M. W. Hamburger, and G. A. Popandopulo Precursory seismicity changes preceding moderate and large earthquakes in the Garm region, Central Asia Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1995; 85(2): 571 - 589. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. H. Thurber, H. R. Quin, and R. Saleh Catalog of locations of nuclear explosions at Balapan, Kazakhstan, 1965 to 1985 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1994; 84(2): 458 - 461. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
