| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025
Abstract
Strong ground motions recorded at 34 sites in the San Francisco Bay region from the Loma Prieta earthquake show marked variations in characteristics dependent on crustal structure and local geological conditions. Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity inferred for sites underlain by "rock" generally occur on the transverse component of motion. They are consistently greater with lower attenuation rates than the corresponding mean value predicted by empirical curves based on previous strong-motion data. Theoretical amplitude distributions and synthetic seismograms calculated for 10-layer models suggest that "bedrock" motions were elevated due in part to the wide-angle reflection of S energy from the base of a relatively thin (25 km) continental crust in the region. Characteristics of geologic and geotechnical units as currently mapped for the San Francisco Bay region show that average ratios of peak horizontal acceleration, velocity and displacement increase with decreasing mean shear-wave velocity. Ratios of peak acceleration for sites on "soil" (alluvium, fill/Bay mud) are statistically larger than those for sites on "hard rock" (sandstone, shale, Franciscan Complex). Spectral ratios establish the existence of predominant site periods with peak amplifications near 15 for potentially damaging levels of ground motion at some sites underlain by alluvium and fill/bay mud. Average spectral amplifications inferred for vertical and the mean horizontal motion are, respectively, (1,1) for sites on the Franciscan Complex (KJf), (1.4, 1.5) for sites on Mesozoic and Tertiary rocks (TMzs), (2.1, 2.0) for sites on the Santa Clara Formation (QTs), (2.3, 2.9) for sites on alluvium (Qal), and (2.1, 4.0) for sites on fill/Bay mud (Qaf/Qhbm). These mean values are not statistically different at the 5% significance level from those inferred from previous low-strain data. Analyses suggest that soil amplification and reflected crustal shear energy were major contributors to levels of ground motion sufficient to cause damage to vulnerable structures at distances near 100 km in the cities of San Francisco and Oakland.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Z. Gvirtzman and J. N. Louie 2D Analysis of Earthquake Ground Motion in Haifa Bay, Israel Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2010; 100(2): 733 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. K. Nath, A. Raj, J. Sharma, K. K. S. Thingbaijam, A. Kumar, D. R. Nandy, M. K. Yadav, S. Dasgupta, K. Majumdar, J. R. Kayal, et al. Site Amplification, Qs, and Source Parameterization in Guwahati Region from Seismic and Geotechnical Analysis Seismological Research Letters, July 1, 2008; 79(4): 526 - 539. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Pancha, J. G. Anderson, and J. N. Louie Characterization of Near-Surface Geology at Strong-Motion Stations in the Vicinity of Reno, Nevada Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 2096 - 2117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Hartzell, S. Harmsen, R. A. Williams, D. Carver, A. Frankel, G. Choy, P.-C. Liu, R. C. Jachens, T. M. Brocher, and C. M. Wentworth Modeling and Validation of a 3D Velocity Structure for the Santa Clara Valley, California, for Seismic-Wave Simulations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1851 - 1881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Ait Brahim, I. Mouayn, A. Abdelouafi, M. Benhalima, and B. Tadili Geophysical and geological interpretation of discrepancies in site residuals in northern Morocco: a simple qualitative approach Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 262(1): 119 - 129. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Frischknecht and J.-J. Wagner Seismic Soil Effect in an Embanked Deep Alpine Valley: A Numerical Investigation of Two-Dimensional Resonance Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2004; 94(1): 171 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ground Motion and Liquefaction Simulation of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2003; 93(6): 2717 - 2736.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site Response, Shallow Shear-Wave Velocity, and Damage in Los Gatos, California, from the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2001; 91(3): 468 - 478.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Faster, Better: Shear-Wave Velocity to 100 Meters Depth from Refraction Microtremor Arrays Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2001; 91(2): 347 - 364.
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. H. Field and the SCEC Phase III Working Group Accounting for Site Effects in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California: Overview of the SCEC Phase III Report Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S1 - S31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualitative Effects of Local Geology on Damage Pattern Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6): 1543 - 1548.
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Jongmans, K. Pitilakis, D. Demanet, D. Raptakis, J. Riepl, C. Horrent, G. Tsokas, K. Lontzetidis, and P.-Y. Bard EURO-SEISTEST: Determination of the geological structure of the Volvi basin and validation of the basin response Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1998; 88(2): 473 - 487. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Hartzell, E. Cranswick, A. Frankel, D. Carver, and M. Meremonte Variability of site response in the Los Angeles urban area Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1997; 87(6): 1377 - 1400. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Harmsen Determination of site amplification in the Los Angeles urban area from inversion of strong-motion records Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1997; 87(4): 866 - 887. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Toshinawa, J. J. Taber, and J. B. Berrill Distribution of ground-motion intensity inferred from questionnaire survey, earthquake recordings, and microtremor measurements--A case study in Christchurch, New Zealand, during the 1994 arthurs pass earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1997; 87(2): 356 - 369. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. A. Beresnev and K.-L. Wen Nonlinear soil response--A reality? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1964 - 1978. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Zhang and A. S. Papageorgiou Simulation of the response of the Marina District Basin, San Francisco, California, to the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1996; 86(5): 1382 - 1400. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Malagnini, P. Tricarico, A. Rovelli, R. B. Herrmann, S. Opice, G. Biella, and R. de Franco Explosion, earthquake, and ambient noise recordings in a Pliocene sediment-filled valley: Inferences on seismic response properties by reference- and non-reference-site techniques Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1996; 86(3): 670 - 682. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Day RMS response of a one-dimensional half-space to SH Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1996; 86(2): 363 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Wennerberg Comment on "Simultaneous study of the source, path, and site effects on strong ground motion during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: A preliminary result on pervasive nonlinear site effects" by Byau-Heng Chin and Keiiti Aki Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1996; 86(1A): 259 - 267. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. H. Field and K. H. Jacob A comparison and test of various site-response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference-site dependent Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1995; 85(4): 1127 - 1143. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. A. Beresnev, K.-L. Wen, and Y. Tein Yeh Nonlinear soil amplification: Its corroboration in Taiwan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1995; 85(2): 496 - 515. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Margheriti, L. Wennerberg, and J. Boatwright A comparison of coda and S-wave spectral ratios as estimates of site response in the southern San Francisco Bay area Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1994; 84(6): 1815 - 1830. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Qu, T.-l. Teng, and J. Wang Modeling of short-period surface-wave propagation in southern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1994; 84(3): 596 - 612. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. C. Seekins and J. Boatwright Ground motion amplification, geology, and damage from the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake in the City of San Francisco Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1994; 84(1): 16 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. JONGMANS and M. CAMPILLO The response of the Ubaye Valley (France) for incident SH and SV waves: Comparison between measurements and modeling Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1993; 83(3): 907 - 924. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. H. FIELD, K. H. JACOB, and S. E. HOUGH Earthquake site response estimation: A weak-motion case study Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1992; 82(6): 2283 - 2307. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
