|
|
||||||||
LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY, L-205, LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA 94550
Abstract
A waveform correlation method is presented for identifying quarry explosions by attributing them to known mines characterized by multiple master events. The objective is to provide a reliable automatic procedure for screening the large number of quarry explosions likely to be detected by networks of in-country stations monitoring compliance with test-ban treaties. The method generalizes existing correlation techniques to compare waveforms from an unlocated event recorded at an array of sensors with a linear combination of master event waveforms recorded at the same array. The use of a linear combination reduces the chance of a missed location caused by some variation in mechanism or spectral excitation between the events being compared. The weights in the linear combination are filters, offering some compensation for variations in source time functions and errors of waveform alignment. The use of array data reduces the likelihood of false attribution by reducing bias and variance in the correlation measurement.
In a test conducted with P-wave data segments recorded at a 13-element array, the method successfully resolves two source regions separated by 4 km at a range of 150 km. Resolution with single-station waveform correlations is marginal due to the limited amount of data. The statistics of the sample waveform correlation coefficient are developed and demonstrate that single-station waveform correlations are unreliable unless estimated with large signal durations T or bandwidths B. A time-bandwidth TB product exceeding 100 (or smaller TB with more stations) is necessary for reliable event attribution.
The related problem of separating superimposed waveforms from two events in different source regions may be solved by cancellation. The waveforms of one event are again approximated by a linear combination of waveforms from master events in the same mine. The residual signals, obtained by subtracting the approximation from the superimposed waveforms, estimate the waveforms from the second event. This method achieves significant separation of waveforms from events 6 km apart at a range of 150 km, using data from the 13-element array. Its resolution exceeds that of conventional beam-forming methods.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Yang, L. Zhu, and R. Chu Fault-Plane Determination of the 18 April 2008 Mount Carmel, Illinois, Earthquake by Detecting and Relocating Aftershocks Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3413 - 3420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Fisk and G. D. McCartor Treatment of Correlation for Clustered Reference Data in Kriging Regional Seismic Discriminants Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1768 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Schaff Semiempirical Statistics of Correlation-Detector Performance Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1495 - 1507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. MacCarthy, H. Hartse, M. Greene, and C. Rowe Using Waveform Cross-Correlation and Satellite Imagery to Identify Repeating Mine Blasts in Eastern Kazakhstan Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2008; 79(3): 393 - 399. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-M. Zhou and B. W. Stump Frequency-Domain Scaling of Single-Fired Mining Explosions with Different Confinements and Explosive Weights Detonated in Porphyry Granite Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 1862 - 1879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Tibuleac and J. M. Britton An Automated Short-Period Surface-Wave Detection Algorithm Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2006; 96(1): 334 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Horton, W.-Y. Kim, and M. Withers The 6 June 2003 Bardwell, Kentucky, Earthquake Sequence: Evidence for a Locally Perturbed Stress Field in the Mississippi Embayment Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2005; 95(2): 431 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Lg-Wave Cross Correlation and Double-Difference Location: Application to the 1999 Xiuyan, China, Sequence Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 867 - 879. |
||||
![]() |
B. W. Stump, D. C. Pearson, and R. E. Reinke Source comparisons between nuclear and chemical explosions detonated at Rainier Mesa, Nevada Test Site Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1999; 89(2): 409 - 422. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Carr and H. D. Garbin Discriminating ripple-fired explosions with high-frequency (> 16 Hz) data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1998; 88(4): 963 - 972. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. H. Hedlin A global test of a time-frequency small-event discriminant Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1998; 88(4): 973 - 988. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. RIVIERE-BARBIER and L. T. GRANT Identification and location of closely spaced mining events Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1993; 83(5): 1527 - 1546. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. ASTER and J. SCOTT Comprehensive characterization of waveform similarity in microearthquake data sets Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1993; 83(4): 1307 - 1314. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. SMITH Discrimination of explosions from simultaneous mining blasts Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1993; 83(1): 160 - 179. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |