Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1991; v. 81; no. 4; p. 1115-1128
© 1991 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FUJIWARA, H.
Right arrow Articles by IRIKURA, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

High-frequency seismic wave radiation from antiplane cohesive zone model and fmax as source effect

HIROYUKI FUJIWARA and KOJIRO IRIKURA

NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR EARTH SCIENCE AND DISASTER PREVENTION, TENNODAI, TSUKUBA 305 Japan
DISASTER PREVENTION RESEARCH INSTITUTE KYOTO UNIVERSITY, Japan

Abstract

While a high-frequency cutoff, fmax, is widely observed in strong-motion seismic data, there is no consensus on whether it is due to source processes or to attenuation and scattering of high-frequency radiation in the crust or near the surface. To investigate the ability of source processes to control fmax, we use a standard antiplane crack propagation formalism to numerically model the effect of rupture nucleation and arrest on high-frequency radiation based on a simple physical hypothesis, a slip-weakening model. We model rupture arrest due to three types of inhomogeneity: (1) a strong portion of rupture medium (barrier); (2) a drop in the pre-existing stress distribution of rupture medium; and (3) a finite length of unruptured medium (asperity) lying between previous ruptures. For cases (2) and (3) high frequencies fall off more steeply than {omega}–2, and fmax cannot be properly defined. For case (1), we find that fmax = VfLf/L2i, where Vf is the final crack velocity, Lf is the final rupture length, and Li is the initial crack size. We extrapolate this result to the rupture for a three-dimensional model and try to explain observed fmax. If we assume that an earthquake is a single crack, Li is large for a large earthquake. However, if we assume that an earthquake is made up of set of cracks and asperities, fmax will be determined by the interaction of small cracks and barriers. If the distribution of these cracks and asperities is independent of source size, then fmax will be nearly constant for all earthquakes.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Seismological Society of America.