HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by JARPE, S. Articles by DOWLA, F. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Performance of high-frequency three-component stations for azimuth estimation from regional seismic phases

LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY, P.O. BOX 808, L-205, LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA 94550

Abstract

We assessed the performance of high-frequency three-component stations for estimating bearing of regional phases using P waves from 18 mining explosions at a single construction site in Norway. We studied errors in bearing estimates as a function of the parameters frequency, frequency bandwidth, SNR, and analysis window length using seismic signals recorded on a three-component high-frequency (> 50 Hz) seismic element (HFSE) located at the NORESS array in Norway. We found that the time-bandwidth product (TB) and SNR are the most important factors in reducing the bearing estimation error. Bearing errors were minimized for SNR a factor of 5, and TB 100. We also found that three-component signals contain bearing information at frequencies as high as 45 Hz when there is sufficient SNR in the signal. Bearing estimation performance can be significantly improved by the appropriate selection of signal parameters, such as window length and frequency. Since these parameters are usually unknown, we propose a parameter variation technique that extracts the best answer by first determining the bearing distribution as a function of the above parameters. The results of this study indicate that with a single three-component station and for high ( 5) SNR, the parameter variation method can determine the bearings of events to within a standard deviation of 6°, which is similar to the uncertainty in NORESS array bearing estimates for the same events.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Galiana-Merino, J. Rosa-Herranz, P. Jauregui, S. Molina, and J. Giner Wavelet Transform Methods for Azimuth Estimation in Local Three-Component Seismograms Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2007; 97(3): 793 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Anant and F. U. Dowla Wavelet transform methods for phase identification in three-component seismograms Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1997; 87(6): 1598 - 1612. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. E. HARBEN and E. HJORTENBERG Variation in microseism power and direction of approach in northeast Greenland Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1993; 83(6): 1939 - 1958. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. K. STECK and W. A. PROTHERO Jr. Observations of direct P-wave slowness and azimuth anomalies for teleseisms recorded in Long Valley caldera, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1993; 83(5): 1391 - 1419. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. SUTEAU-HENSON Three-component analysis of regional phases at NORESS and ARCESS: Polarization and phase identification Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1991; 81(6): 2419 - 2440. [Abstract] [PDF]