Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1990; v. 80; no. 6B; p. 1951-1968
© 1990 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HARRIS, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Comparison of the direction estimation performance of high-frequency seismic arrays and three-component stations

DAVID B. HARRIS

TREATY VERIFICATION PROGRAM LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY, LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA 94550

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretical comparison of the backazimuth and velocity estimation performance of arrays and three-component stations in severe noise conditions. Theoretical estimates of performance for low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) are validated through simulation. The high SNR limits of array performance are determined through an empirical study of 23 events at a single source location. Theory and simulation indicate a gradual and uniform deterioration in three-component station performance as the SNR is decreased, beginning at relatively high SNR. At very low SNR, the signal is overwhelmed by the noise, and the performance reaches an asymptotic plateau determined by a priori physical limitations on the velocity of incident waves. By contrast, arrays exhibit a sharp transition between a high SNR performance floor determined, presumably, by scattering effects in the signal, and a low SNR plateau. The SNR threshold for the transition in array performance is low enough that a band of SNRs exist for which arrays have usefully small direction and velocity errors, but three-component stations do not.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Large Teleseismic P Wavefront Deflections Observed with Broadband Arrays
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2003; 93(2): 747 - 756.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. Koch and U. Kradolfer
Investigation of azimuth residuals observed at stations of the GSETT-3 Alpha network
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1997; 87(6): 1576 - 1597.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C.-H. Lin and S. W. Roecker
P-wave backazimuth anomalies observed by a small-aperture seismic array at Pinyon Flat, southern California: Implications for structure and source location
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1996; 86(2): 470 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. H. R. Bokelmann
Azimuth and slowness deviations from the GERESS regional array
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1995; 85(5): 1456 - 1463.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. K. STECK and W. A. PROTHERO Jr.
Observations of direct P-wave slowness and azimuth anomalies for teleseisms recorded in Long Valley caldera, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1993; 83(5): 1391 - 1419.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. B. HARRIS
A waveform correlation method for identifying quarry explosions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1991; 81(6): 2395 - 2418.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. SUTEAU-HENSON
Three-component analysis of regional phases at NORESS and ARCESS: Polarization and phase identification
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1991; 81(6): 2419 - 2440.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. JARPE and F. DOWLA
Performance of high-frequency three-component stations for azimuth estimation from regional seismic phases
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1991; 81(3): 987 - 999.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. C. WALCK and E. P. CHAEL
Optimal backazimuth estimation for three-component recordings of regional seismic events
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1991; 81(2): 643 - 666.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. MYKKELTVEIT, F. RINGDAL, T. Kvaerna, and R. W. ALEWINE
Application of regional arrays in seismic verification research
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1990; 80(6B): 1777 - 1800.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the Seismological Society of America.