|
|
||||||||
DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS AND PLANETARY PHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90024
Abstract
We adopt a lognormal distribution for earthquake interval times, and we use a locally determined rather than a generic coefficient of variation, to estimate the probability of occurrence of characteristic earthquakes. We extend previous methods in two ways. First, we account for the aseismic period since the last event (the "seismic drought") in updating the parameter estimates. Second, in calculating the earthquake probability we allow for uncertainties in the mean recurrence time and its variance by averaging over their likelihood. Both extensions can strongly influence the calculated earthquake probabilities, especially for long droughts in regions with few documented earthquakes. As time passes, the recurrence time and variance estimates increase if no additional events occur, leading eventually to an affirmative answer to the question in the title. The earthquake risk estimate begins to drop when the drought exceeds the estimated recurrence time. For the Parkfield area of California, the probability of a magnitude 6 event in the next 5 years is about 34 per cent, much lower than previous estimates. Furthermore, the estimated 5-year probability will decrease with every uneventful year after 1988. For the Coachella Valley segment of the San Andreas Fault, the uncertainties are large, and we estimate the probability of a large event in the next 30 years to be 9 per cent, again much smaller than previous estimates. On the Mojave (Pallett Creek) segment the catalog includes 10 events, and the present drought is just approaching the recurrence interval, so the estimated risk is revised very little by our methods.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Zoller and S. Hainzl Recurrence Time Distributions of Large Earthquakes in a Stochastic Model for Coupled Fault Systems: The Role of Fault Interaction Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1679 - 1687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Yakovlev, D. L. Turcotte, J. B. Rundle, and P. B. Rundle Simulation-Based Distributions of Earthquake Recurrence Times on the San Andreas Fault System Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 1995 - 2007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Brownian Model for Recurrent Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2233 - 2250. |
||||
![]() |
A Power-Law Function for Earthquake Interarrival Time and Magnitude Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2002; 92(5): 1783 - 1794. |
||||
![]() |
D. Sornette and L. Knopoff The paradox of the expected time until the next earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1997; 87(4): 789 - 798. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Papazachos and E. E. Papadimitriou Evaluation of the global applicability of the regional time- and magnitude-predictable seismicity model Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1997; 87(4): 799 - 808. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Boschi, P. Gasperini, and F. Mulargia Forecasting where larger crustal earthquakes are likely to occur in Italy in the near future Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1995; 85(5): 1475 - 1482. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Working Group on California Earthquake Probabiliti Seismic hazards in Southern California: Probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1995; 85(2): 379 - 439. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. SAVAGE Criticism of some forecasts of the national earthquake prediction evaluation council Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1991; 81(3): 862 - 881. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |