Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1989; v. 79; no. 5; p. 1439-1456
© 1989 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAVIS, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by KAGAN, Y. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The longer it has been since the last earthquake, the longer the expected time till the next?

PAUL M. DAVIS, DAVID D. JACKSON and YAN Y. KAGAN

DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS AND PLANETARY PHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90024

Abstract

We adopt a lognormal distribution for earthquake interval times, and we use a locally determined rather than a generic coefficient of variation, to estimate the probability of occurrence of characteristic earthquakes. We extend previous methods in two ways. First, we account for the aseismic period since the last event (the "seismic drought") in updating the parameter estimates. Second, in calculating the earthquake probability we allow for uncertainties in the mean recurrence time and its variance by averaging over their likelihood. Both extensions can strongly influence the calculated earthquake probabilities, especially for long droughts in regions with few documented earthquakes. As time passes, the recurrence time and variance estimates increase if no additional events occur, leading eventually to an affirmative answer to the question in the title. The earthquake risk estimate begins to drop when the drought exceeds the estimated recurrence time. For the Parkfield area of California, the probability of a magnitude 6 event in the next 5 years is about 34 per cent, much lower than previous estimates. Furthermore, the estimated 5-year probability will decrease with every uneventful year after 1988. For the Coachella Valley segment of the San Andreas Fault, the uncertainties are large, and we estimate the probability of a large event in the next 30 years to be 9 per cent, again much smaller than previous estimates. On the Mojave (Pallett Creek) segment the catalog includes 10 events, and the present drought is just approaching the recurrence interval, so the estimated risk is revised very little by our methods.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. Zoller and S. Hainzl
Recurrence Time Distributions of Large Earthquakes in a Stochastic Model for Coupled Fault Systems: The Role of Fault Interaction
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1679 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. Yakovlev, D. L. Turcotte, J. B. Rundle, and P. B. Rundle
Simulation-Based Distributions of Earthquake Recurrence Times on the San Andreas Fault System
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 1995 - 2007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A Brownian Model for Recurrent Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2233 - 2250.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A Power-Law Function for Earthquake Interarrival Time and Magnitude
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2002; 92(5): 1783 - 1794.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Sornette and L. Knopoff
The paradox of the expected time until the next earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1997; 87(4): 789 - 798.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. B. Papazachos and E. E. Papadimitriou
Evaluation of the global applicability of the regional time- and magnitude-predictable seismicity model
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1997; 87(4): 799 - 808.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. Boschi, P. Gasperini, and F. Mulargia
Forecasting where larger crustal earthquakes are likely to occur in Italy in the near future
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1995; 85(5): 1475 - 1482.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Working Group on California Earthquake Probabiliti
Seismic hazards in Southern California: Probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1995; 85(2): 379 - 439.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. C. SAVAGE
Criticism of some forecasts of the national earthquake prediction evaluation council
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1991; 81(3): 862 - 881.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the Seismological Society of America.