HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by HUDNUT, K. W. Articles by ROCKWELL, T. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Slip on the Elmore Ranch fault during the past 330 years and its relation to slip on the Superstition Hills fault

LAMONT-DOHERTY GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY, PALISADES, NEW YORK 10964
DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCE SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92182
DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10027

Abstract

The Elmore Ranch fault is a left-lateral fault that strikes northeast within the right-lateral transform boundary that strikes northwest through southern California. It lies transverse and adjacent to the segment of the Superstition Hills fault that ruptured in 1987. Rupture of the Elmore Ranch fault (M_S = 6.2) preceded rupture of the Superstition Hills fault (M_S = 6.6) by about 11.4 hr. The Elmore Ranch fault slipped at the surface in 1987 with left-lateral displacements of up to 130 mm. Geological data indicate that it had slipped prehistorically, sometime after about 1660 A.D., probably in a single event. Excavations at three sites enable the following comparisons:At these sites, the only significant component of dip slip (down to the southeast) was found on the west strand for slip previous to 1987.

The Superstition Hills fault has also been documented to have experienced one slip event between 1660 and 1987. Thus these slip events on the Elmore Ranch and Superstition Hills faults may have occurred in a sequence similar to that in 1987. Neither the main fault nor the cross-fault, however, appear to have exactly duplicated their previous surficial slip. Previous slip was probably smaller on the Superstition Hills fault and larger on the Elmore Ranch fault zone than in the 1987 event. Because the temporal correlation between previous slip events is not proven, rupture sequences other than a doublet in which main fault rupture follows cross-fault rupture are possible.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. W. Briggs and S. G. Wesnousky Late Pleistocene and Holocene Paleoearthquake Activity of the Olinghouse Fault Zone, Nevada Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1301 - 1313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Petersen and S. G. Wesnousky Fault slip rates and earthquake histories for active faults in southern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1994; 84(5): 1608 - 1649. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. C. HANKS and C. R. ALLEN The Elmore Ranch and Superstition Hills earthquakes of 24 November 1987: Introduction to the special issue Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1989; 79(2): 231 - 238. [PDF]

				P. L. WILLIAMS and H. W. MAGISTRALE Slip along the Superstition Hills fault associated with the 24 November 1987 Superstition Hills, California, earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1989; 79(2): 390 - 410. [Abstract] [PDF]