|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS, LEEDS LS2 9JT, UNITED KINGDOM
DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, P.O. BOX 78, CARDIFF CF1 1XL, United Kingdom
Abstract
The relative amplitude method is applied to the few available good quality teleseismic P-wave seismograms from five presumed double nuclear explosions and one known multiple chemical explosion, under the "naive" assumption that the observed multiple arrivals correspond to P, pP, and sP from a single earthquakean interpretation which is indeed consistent with the body-wave arrival time data in most cases. The purpose is to investigate the ability of relative amplitudes to identify correctly such multiple events for which established discrimination criteria may give earthquake-like or ambiguous results. For five of the examples, observed relative amplitudes from only four azimuthally well-distributed array seismograms are sufficient to exclude the single-earthquake interpretation. Deliberate attempts to simulate earthquake teleseismic P wave-forms using multiple explosions are restricted to simulation studies, and one of these is analyzed here using the same approach. We conclude that relative amplitudes can act as a valuable aid to source discrimination in cases where complexity gives rise to fallibility of conventional discriminants, even where only a small number of well-distributed teleseismic short-period array seismograms are available, their signal-to-noise ratios being maximized by suitable array design and careful choice of array site. The network need not be dense, since closely spaced observations of the focal sphere generally embody a large measure of redundancy.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |